Space Time Interval: Solving Distance & C-Value

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem related to the space-time interval using the equation s² = c²(t²) - (x²). The user successfully calculates the distance x as approximately 69 light-years when time is set at 100 years and distance at 72 light-years. Key points include understanding when to use c = 1 (when both time and distance are in compatible units like light-years and years) versus c = 3 x 10^8 m/s (when using meters and seconds). The conversation emphasizes that light-years and years can be treated as equivalent units in certain contexts, simplifying calculations. Overall, the thread clarifies unit conversions and the application of the speed of light in different measurement systems.
seto6
Messages
248
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2yx4q4w.jpg

Homework Equations



s2=c2(t2)-(x2)

The Attempt at a Solution


so..

s=72ly and t=100y c=c

(72)2=(1)2(1002)-(x2)

solving for x which is the distance i get x=69.39 aprox= 69.

my question is when do we know to let c=1 or c=3*108 m/s

how do we go back and forth between light year and year?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
seto6 said:
my question is when do we know to let c=1 or c=3*108 m/s

how do we go back and forth between light year and year?

At the risk of being overly simplistic, light year and year are essentially the same units. One implies distance, and the other time, but at the unit level, they are essentially the same.

Special relativity cuts away from classical Newtonian physics by placing space and time on the same footing. Time is simple one more dimension to the other 3, in 4-dimensional space-time. And they can be expressed in the same units. For example, we can have four dimensions, all measured in years. We say the 3 spatial dimensions are "light years" but that's just to avoid confusion -- its really the same thing as a year, as far as the math is concerned.

We could also express all 4 dimensions in meters. If we do, we would probably call the time dimension units "light meters." But it's really just measuring meters.

To answer your question, if both time and the spatial dimensions share the same units, set c = 1. This is true if everything is in years/light years, seconds/light seconds, meters/light meters, fathoms/lite fathoms, or anything -- as long as all 4 dimensions share the same units.

If you express time and length as separate units, you'll need some conversion factor. For example if you express distance in meters, and time in seconds, that's where the 3 x 108 m/s factor of c comes in.

As an exercise, try this. Convert 100 y to seconds. Convert 72 ly to meters. Now solve the problem, except this time use 3 x 108 m/s for c. Then convert the final answer back to light years. You'll get the same answer as you did originally. :cool:

[Edit: I said earlier that special relativity places "space and time on the same footing." I should of said mostly equal footing. There is still that negative sign involved with the time dimension (or negative sign with the spatial dimensions -- depending on which author you are following) when taking the dot product of two 4-vectors. But other than that it's pretty equal.]
 
Last edited:
seto6 said:

Homework Statement


2yx4q4w.jpg



Homework Equations



s2=c2(t2)-(x2)

The Attempt at a Solution


so..

s=72ly and t=100y c=c

(72)2=(1)2(1002)-(x2)

solving for x which is the distance i get x=69.39 aprox= 69.

my question is when do we know to let c=1 or c=3*108 m/s

how do we go back and forth between light year and year?

If you use a system of units with distances in meter and time in seconds, you must use c = 3x108 m/s.

If you use distances in ly and times in year, then the value of c is 1 ly/y (one light-year per year). If we don't write the units, then we simply use c=1

In this problem, you used a value in year for the time and a value in ly for the distance, so you had to use c=1.

Hope that helps.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top