Could Space-Time Variability Explain Unexpected Spacecraft Speeds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cary cato
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Space-time
cary cato
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
if the time component of space-time is not a constant as assumed, i think it could explain the old question of why our spacecraft don't move at the expected speed/acceleration.

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2009/11/rosetta-space-mystery-could-be-clue-to-a-new-physics.html#more
 
Physics news on Phys.org
this should be a testable idea. for example, the time-correction necessary to match the velocity and/or acceration for all the discreptancies, pioneer probe, voyger probe, gravity assisted acceleration, etc. ...should be identical.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top