Space travel on TV infuriates me

AI Thread Summary
Space travel in television often diverges significantly from realistic portrayals, leading to frustration among viewers. Sci-fi spacecraft are depicted as simplistic, made from junkyard materials, and capable of instantaneous travel between planets, which contrasts sharply with the complex, high-tech reality of actual space travel. The discussion highlights a lack of depth in exploring the societal and psychological implications of advanced technology in these shows. Instead of addressing the significant challenges of interstellar travel, many series resort to generic plots set in a sci-fi context. Overall, the conversation emphasizes a desire for more authentic and thought-provoking representations of space exploration in media.
Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
So when humans talk of space travel, we imagine these horribly complex and sanitized capsules or small spacecraft with people in big spacesuits. The vehicles are made of super lightweight material with extraordinarily high-tech components and if the slightest thing goes wrong, the thing could explode. Of course, to top it off, if you ever want to put something in space, it takes days just to put the stupid vehicle on the launchpad.

Then comes space travel on television. In between drooling all over myself fantasizing about that summer gaul chick on firefly or whatever, I become infuriated how all the spacecraft in sci-fi shows are like, made of **** metal that you can find in a junkyard. They also can hop between planets in no time with flight control systems full of nobs and cranks you'd find in a 19th century train.

Also, people who ride around on horses can also fly spaceships. RAWR.

Thus concludes my 4:30am rant about television. Time to go to bed and have happy dreams about http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1132359/" . Hawt.

DISCUSS!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
One seems to be hot and bothered.

I recommend a cold shower. :biggrin:
 
Pengwuino said:
So when humans talk of space travel, we imagine these horribly complex and sanitized capsules or small spacecraft with people in big spacesuits. The vehicles are made of super lightweight material with extraordinarily high-tech components and if the slightest thing goes wrong, the thing could explode. Of course, to top it off, if you ever want to put something in space, it takes days just to put the stupid vehicle on the launchpad.

Then comes space travel on television. In between drooling all over myself fantasizing about that summer gaul chick on firefly or whatever, I become infuriated how all the spacecraft in sci-fi shows are like, made of **** metal that you can find in a junkyard. They also can hop between planets in no time with flight control systems full of nobs and cranks you'd find in a 19th century train.

Also, people who ride around on horses can also fly spaceships. RAWR.

Thus concludes my 4:30am rant about television. Time to go to bed and have happy dreams about http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1132359/" . Hawt.

DISCUSS!

I completely agree, rather than making an interesting show featuring the gargantuan challenges to interstellar space travel
  • STL
  • propulsion efficiency
  • lack of gravity
  • radiation
  • need for ecology
  • need for industrial complex
  • need for large population
  • social/political/economic issues
  • etc etc etc
TV shows take generic plots and bolt them into a "sci-fi" setting. I have never seen a TV show or film that has properly explored how the technology they employ would change society and psychology. Instead they just take some sort of idealogical western civilisation (or if they are trying to be avant-garde something typically far eastern) and give it lasers :rolleyes: big woop.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd be impressed if the space ships just stopped making whooshing sounds and "flying" through space [aerodynamically].

I found it quite amusing to read a UFO website that debunked this video almost immediately based on the argument that "real UFOs don't fly aerodynamically!" :smile:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAqfOgbxHXs
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top