Space Travel: SR Questions Explored

PerenialQuest
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

I'm trying to wrap my head around SR and I have a couple questions: If two space travelers (A) and (C) take off from a Planet (B) in opposite directions and each travels just over 1/2c, do they vanish from each others' view? I don't see why they wouldn't but

If yes, doesn't that violate SR which nothing can travel at v > c? Since they don't observe each other is that avoided?

Also does that mean that no information can ever travel from (A) to (C)? If yes, couldn't (B) just act as a medium of communication which is moving at < c in relation to both (A) and (C).

Also, let's say (A) and (C) turn around and travel back toward each other with a combined v > c, what would this look like to each space traveler?

Thanks for your time,
Rich
 
Physics news on Phys.org
huh! it really is! that's wild! thanks
 
Ok but Lawrence Krauss told me that because of Dark Energy, all the galaxies will eventually be traveling at > c with relation to each other and will disappear from each others' view. He also said that this doesn't violation SR. Explain that!
 
SR doesn't apply to cosmology. In GR, the relative velocity of cosmologically distant objects is not uniquely well defined. It's only locally that relative velocities are well defined and have to be <c.

The interpretation of cosmological horizons that you're quoting is an oversimplification: Davis and Lineweaver, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 21 (2004) 97, msowww.anu.edu.au/~charley/papers/DavisLineweaver04.pdf
 
ok thanks!
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top