Spacecraft altitude and orbit problem

AI Thread Summary
A spacecraft at 600 km altitude ejects a satellite, resulting in a change in its velocity due to conservation of momentum. The initial calculations show the spacecraft's new speed is approximately 9.167 m/s after the satellite separation. The discussion emphasizes the need to determine the spacecraft's new angular momentum and speed to find its altitude at phi = pi, which corresponds to the apogee of its orbit. Users are advised to simplify equations by using specific angular momentum and the universal gravitational constant for accurate calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding orbital mechanics to solve the altitude problem effectively.
Alomonger Pete
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A spacecraft (with its cargo, a satellite) is circling the Earth at a
constant speed and an altitude of 600km. The combined mass of the craft and
the satellite is 1.20×10^5 kg (kilograms).

At phi = 0, the captain ejects the 1.10×10^4 kg satellite out the
back. The speed of the satellite relative to the spacecraft at the time of
separation is 100 m/s (meters per second).

When the spacecraft reaches phi = pi, what will its altitude above the
Earth be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is my attempt at answering the above question:

Applying the Principle of Conservation of Linear Momentum:

0 = -(1.10×10^4)×100 + (1.20×10^5)×V

Hence V = 9.167 m/s, where V is the relative speed of the spacecraft after
ejecting the satellite.

I assume that 'phi = 0' means that the spacecraft is currently at the
perigee of an elliptic orbit and I need to find its altitude when phi = pi
(at the apogee).

I believe I am meant to use some or all of the following equations:

r = l/(1 + e cos(phi))

l = L^2/GMm^2

e = AL^2/GMm^2

1/r = Acos(phi) + GMm/L^2

...where:

G = 6.67×10^-11 Nm^2kg^-2

M = 5.98×10^24 kg

radius of Earth: 6.37×10^6 m

However I have no idea what to do next. Please advise me. THANK YOU.
 
Well, you have an equation that says what the radial position is if you know the angular momentum. Conservation of momentum gives you the new orbital speed of the spacecraft .

So how do you find the new angular momentum of the spacecraft ?

-Dan
 
Alomonger Pete said:
Here is my attempt at answering the above question:

Applying the Principle of Conservation of Linear Momentum:

0 = -(1.10×10^4)×100 + (1.20×10^5)×V

Hence V = 9.167 m/s, where V is the relative speed of the spacecraft after
ejecting the satellite.

I assume that 'phi = 0' means that the spacecraft is currently at the
perigee of an elliptic orbit and I need to find its altitude when phi = pi
(at the apogee).

I believe I am meant to use some or all of the following equations:

r = l/(1 + e cos(phi))

l = L^2/GMm^2

e = AL^2/GMm^2

1/r = Acos(phi) + GMm/L^2

...where:

G = 6.67×10^-11 Nm^2kg^-2

M = 5.98×10^24 kg

radius of Earth: 6.37×10^6 m

However I have no idea what to do next. Please advise me. THANK YOU.
You have a couple problems.

One, you calculated the difference in velocity between the initial speed of the spacecraft and final speed, but still don't know the speed of either.

Secondly, your second equation can be simplified by using the 'specific angular momentum per unit mass' (the mass is squared in both the numerator and denominator, canceling out). The easier equation is:

r = \frac{\frac {h^2}{\mu}}{1 + e cos \phi}

\mu is just the universal gravitational constant times the mass of the Earth (no sense multiplying two constants by each other over and over - in fact, the WGS-84 value for it is 3.986004418 x 10^14 m^3/sec^2).
Edit: Since you're using rounded numbers for G and M, your number won't match the WGS-84 value. In fact, with a radius of 6370 km, you're probably using a different datum than WGS-84. The WGS-84 radius is 6378.137 km.

I mention this only because the specific angular momentum is also equal to the cross product of the radius vector and the velocity vector - or, algebraically, the radius times the speed times the angle between the two vectors if the origins coinided. Since you started out in a circular orbit, the velocity is always perpendicular to the radius. That means you can use the specific angular momentum to determine your initial speed. Or, if you left the mass into get your real angular momentum, you could still find your linear momentum, and then divide by your mass (it's just easier to leave the mass out).

Once you have your initial speed, you could use conservation of linear momentum to determine the final speed (actually, since you already calculated how much the spacecraft sped up, you could just add that to your initial speed).

(1.20*10^5)(v_i)=(1.1*10^4)(v_f-100) + (1.09*10^5)(v_f)

From there, you should get a better start.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top