diazdaiz
- 10
- 2
i am new at relativity, it said mass can curve spacetime, does this mean spacetime will curve to a new 5th dimension (1-3 for space dimension, 4 for time dimension)?
The discussion centers on the relationship between mass, spacetime curvature, and the concept of a potential fifth dimension in the context of relativity. Participants explore the implications of mass curving spacetime and whether this suggests the existence of additional dimensions beyond the conventional four.
Participants express differing views on the necessity of a fifth dimension in relation to spacetime curvature, with some arguing against its necessity while others explore the implications of curvature types. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the existence of a fifth dimension.
Participants note the complexity of curvature types and the conditions under which they apply, indicating that the discussion is limited by assumptions about dimensionality and the nature of spacetime.
No, it doesn't mean that.diazdaiz said:i am new at relativity, it said mass can curve spacetime, does this mean spacetime will curve to a new 5th dimension (1-3 for space dimension, 4 for time dimension)?
Bit of a contrived example, but consider the surface of a hemisphere. Project this surface vertically onto its equatorial plane. Inherit the distance metric from the original hemisphere to judge "straight lines" in the resulting space. It now has intrinsic but not extrinsic curvature.Ibix said:I suppose it might have intrinsic curvature but not extrinsic
Or the other way around, I guess. Embed the manifold in a higher dimensional manifold whose metric is contrived to match that of the embedded manifold where appropriate.jbriggs444 said:Bit of a contrived example, but consider the surface of a hemisphere. Project this surface vertically onto its equatorial plane. Inherit the distance metric from the original hemisphere to judge "straight lines" in the resulting space. It now has intrinsic but not extrinsic curvature.