Spacetime Curve: Mass Effects & 5th Dimension

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter diazdaiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves Spacetime
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between mass, spacetime curvature, and the concept of a potential fifth dimension in the context of relativity. Participants explore the implications of mass curving spacetime and whether this suggests the existence of additional dimensions beyond the conventional four.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the curvature of spacetime due to mass implies the existence of a fifth dimension, referencing the traditional four dimensions of space and time.
  • Another participant asserts that mass curving spacetime does not necessitate a fifth dimension, emphasizing that the universe is not considered to be embedded in a higher-dimensional space.
  • A participant introduces the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic curvature, explaining that intrinsic curvature can be measured independently of external spaces, while extrinsic curvature involves embedding in higher dimensions.
  • Examples are provided to illustrate intrinsic curvature, such as the surface of the Earth and the surface of a hemisphere, highlighting that certain surfaces can exhibit intrinsic curvature without extrinsic curvature.
  • Further elaboration on the nature of curvature in relativity suggests that only intrinsic curvature is relevant, reinforcing the idea that additional dimensions are unnecessary for understanding spacetime in this framework.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of a fifth dimension in relation to spacetime curvature, with some arguing against its necessity while others explore the implications of curvature types. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the existence of a fifth dimension.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of curvature types and the conditions under which they apply, indicating that the discussion is limited by assumptions about dimensionality and the nature of spacetime.

diazdaiz
Messages
10
Reaction score
2
i am new at relativity, it said mass can curve spacetime, does this mean spacetime will curve to a new 5th dimension (1-3 for space dimension, 4 for time dimension)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
diazdaiz said:
i am new at relativity, it said mass can curve spacetime, does this mean spacetime will curve to a new 5th dimension (1-3 for space dimension, 4 for time dimension)?
No, it doesn't mean that.
 
There are two types of curvature, intrinsic and extrinsic curvature.

Intrinsic curvature can be measured without reference to an external space - for example, the intrinsic curvature of the surface of the Earth can be detected by drawing a large triangle and noting that the angles don't sum to 180°.

On the other hand, extrinsic curvature requires a space to be embedded in a higher-dimensional space. For example if you take the surface of a cylinder, this is curved in the sense that straight lines in 3d space that touch the surface of the cylinder don't necessarily stay touching the cylinder.

A surface can have extrinsic curvature but not intrinsic curvature (for example, the surface of the cylinder has no intrinsic curvature - triangles drawn on it have angles that sum to 180°). I suppose it might have intrinsic curvature but not extrinsic (can't think of an example, though). Or it might have both.

In relativity, we only care about intrinsic curvature. As far as we know, the universe is not embedded in a higher dimensional space, so it doesn't make sense to talk about extrinsic curvature. So, as martinbn says, the answer to your question is no. We have no need to propose more than four dimensions to talk about the kind of curvature that is used in relativity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker and Heikki Tuuri
Ibix said:
I suppose it might have intrinsic curvature but not extrinsic
Bit of a contrived example, but consider the surface of a hemisphere. Project this surface vertically onto its equatorial plane. Inherit the distance metric from the original hemisphere to judge "straight lines" in the resulting space. It now has intrinsic but not extrinsic curvature.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
jbriggs444 said:
Bit of a contrived example, but consider the surface of a hemisphere. Project this surface vertically onto its equatorial plane. Inherit the distance metric from the original hemisphere to judge "straight lines" in the resulting space. It now has intrinsic but not extrinsic curvature.
Or the other way around, I guess. Embed the manifold in a higher dimensional manifold whose metric is contrived to match that of the embedded manifold where appropriate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
835