Spacetime Interval: Is it Invariant Under Rotations?

Kalidor
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I know that the spacetime interval is the same in coordinate system moving wrt each other at constant speed. But is it true that the spacetime interval is invariant under rotations? If so can you suggest a proof or post a link to one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The proper interval is

ds2 = -c2dt2 - (dx2 + dy2 + dz2)

and the spatial part is invariant under rotations ( as in 3D Euclidean) , so the whole thing is also.

dx' = cos(a)dx + sin(a)dy

dy' = -sin(a)dx + cos(a)dy

(dx')2 + (dy')2 = dx2 (cos(a)2+sin(a)2) + dy2(cos(a)2+sin(a)2) = dx2 + dy2
 
Last edited:
It is not invariant for a rotation with an angular velocity.
 
Meir Achuz said:
It is not invariant for a rotation with an angular velocity.
I thought the original question was just about inertial frames with spatial axes rotated relative to one another, not about non-inertial rotating frames. In a non-inertial frame the metric line element would have to be something different from ds2 = c2dt2 - (dx2 + dy2 + dz2)
 
Kalidor said:
I know that the spacetime interval is the same in coordinate system moving wrt each other at constant speed. But is it true that the spacetime interval is invariant under rotations? If so can you suggest a proof or post a link to one?
In general, to determine if it is invariant under some transformation simply apply the transformation and see if it simplifies back to the original form as shown by Mentz114.
 
Kalidor said:
I know that the spacetime interval is the same in coordinate system moving wrt each other at constant speed. But is it true that the spacetime interval is invariant under rotations? If so can you suggest a proof or post a link to one?

The proof is almost by definition.

The spacetime intervasl contains the metric which is a covariant 2-tensor, and two spacetime coordinate differentials, each of which are 1-contravariant tensors. So under the rules of tensor transformations, the spacetime interval is forced to be a scalar underr ANY coordinate transformation.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top