Spacetime & Rotating Planet: Velocities Impact

  • Thread starter Thread starter PaulRacer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spacetime Sphere
PaulRacer
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
What affect does spacetime have on a rotating planet? (Velocities in the center differ from surface velocities)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know the answer but here's what i think the answer might be...

Spacetime does not, and can not, affect different parts of the same object differently.

Here’s why I think it can’t.

Time is relative based on a frame of reference. Which means, a planet (the planet) has only 1 frame of spacetime reference – regardless if it is spinning or not. It experiences time as whole – as a single frame.

The only way time differs is when spacetime is observed from, at least, two reference frames. It’s only the perception of time that differs – not time itself. Time doesn’t really change the way you’re thinking it does, like energy. The only thing that changes is how time is perceived – relatively speaking.

In other words, a person standing on the surface of the Earth will perceive time at a slower rate than a person at the center – but it’s only perception. This does not imply that the Earth itself is experiencing different times. It only implies that, from the reference frame of someone on the earth’s surface comparing itself against the frame of person in the core, that time slows down.

Bottom line, time is experienced by Earth at a constant rate, surface to core, - not a varible rate. This is regardless of the Earth "standing still", rotating, orbiting, or arching through the cosmos.
 
LawrenceM said:
I don't know the answer but here's what i think the answer might be...

Spacetime does not, and can not, affect different parts of the same object differently.

Here’s why I think it can’t.

Time is relative based on a frame of reference. Which means, a planet (the planet) has only 1 frame of spacetime reference – regardless if it is spinning or not. It experiences time as whole – as a single frame.

The only way time differs is when spacetime is observed from, at least, two reference frames. It’s only the perception of time that differs – not time itself. Time doesn’t really change the way you’re thinking it does, like energy. The only thing that changes is how time is perceived – relatively speaking.

In other words, a person standing on the surface of the Earth will perceive time at a slower rate than a person at the center – but it’s only perception. This does not imply that the Earth itself is experiencing different times. It only implies that, from the reference frame of someone on the earth’s surface comparing itself against the frame of person in the core, that time slows down.

Bottom line, time is experienced by Earth at a constant rate, surface to core, - not a varible rate. This is regardless of the Earth "standing still", rotating, orbiting, or arching through the cosmos.

This is wrong.

For a quantitative analysis, see

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1543402#post1543402.
 
Is it possible that this would be cumulative and could possibly wind the Earth matter like a spring? To put it another way, if you had a stick the length of the diameter of the Earth and spun it at the same rate for the same amount of time as the earth, would the stick appear as a spiral? (I am wondering if this is why our galaxy looks the way it does.)
 
I know these examples are different because of gravitational time effects but would either be true? I attempted to understand the mathematical analysis but came up waaaayyyy short.(2x9=4 right?) Any help appreciated.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
993
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
103
Views
5K
Back
Top