Spacetime states in Rovelli's book Quantum Gravity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Rovelli's book "Quantum Gravity" introduces the concept of spacetime states through functions f(x,t) defined on compact spacetime, which are zero outside specific regions. These functions generalize conventional wave packets, represented as f(x,t) = f(x) δ(t), associated with instantaneous measurements. The wave function φ(x',t') is constructed using the propagator w, satisfying the Schrödinger equation, but loses the information contained in f. Rovelli asserts that f and f' are equivalent if they yield the same wave function φ, raising questions about the utility of the information in f.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger equation
  • Knowledge of propagators in quantum field theory
  • Basic concepts of test functions in mathematical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of test functions in quantum mechanics
  • Study the role of propagators in quantum field theory
  • Research the mathematical foundations of compact spacetime
  • Investigate the equivalence of wave functions in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the foundations of quantum gravity and the mathematical formalism of spacetime states.

naima
Gold Member
Messages
936
Reaction score
54
spacetime states in Rovelli's book "Quantum Gravity"

happy new year everybody,

I am reading "quantum gravity" of Rovelli.
He introduces functions f(x,t) defined on compact of space time that are zero outside.
They correspond to the time and space needed to a measurement.
page 168: they generalize conventional wave packets for which [tex]f(x,t) = f(x) \delta(t)[/tex] which are associated to instantaneous measurements.
There is no equation for them
He constructs the usual wave fonction [tex]\phi(x',t') = \int dx dt w(x',t',x,t) f(x,t)[/tex]
Where w is the propagator. This wave function satisfies the Schrödinger equation.
We lose the information we had with f!
He says f and f' are equivalent iff they give the same [tex]\phi[/tex]
Ok but why have we not to use the information in f?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I found this: http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0111016"
It seems to be a new formalism building classical Quantum Mechanics upon "test functions" (the spacetime states)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K