SpaceX's 5K Satellites: A Risk of Man-Made Meteors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter swampwiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellites
AI Thread Summary
SpaceX's plan to deploy 5,000 satellites in low Earth orbit raises concerns about the risk of man-made meteors if these satellites malfunction or deplete their fuel. The discussion highlights that the size of a satellite is not the only factor in determining whether it will burn up upon reentry; density and shape are also crucial. For instance, large solar panel arrays may disintegrate, while denser objects could survive reentry. Historical examples, such as Skylab, illustrate the potential dangers of satellite debris falling to Earth. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for careful consideration of satellite design to mitigate risks associated with reentry.
swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
I was reading about SpaceX wanting to put up 5K satellites, with these put in a low enough orbit that they would need to be periodically boosted to stay up, and simply falling out of the sky within a few months if they malfunction or run out of fuel. This makes me wonder about how small a satellite would need to be to be assured of burning up completely - lest we get man-made "meteors".
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Size alone is a meaningless criterion. You need to know the density and general shape. For example, a HUGE array of solar panels would burn up on reentry but the same mass as a solid dense sphere might not.
 
IIRC, Skylab showered parts of Australia with its components. Low density stuff just fluttered down, titanium pressure tanks played 'drop bear'...
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top