Specific Question about Susskind's Lecture on Tachyons

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter No Upper Bound
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lecture Specific
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Leonard Susskind's lecture on tachyons discusses the properties of the first excited state of an open string, concluding that it must be massless, akin to a photon. He establishes that the ground state must have a negative mass squared, leading to the equation m_0^2 + 1 = 0. The lecture emphasizes that only two polarization states exist for massless particles, which is crucial for maintaining Lorentz invariance. In a D-dimensional space, such as the bosonic open string with D=26, there are 24 possible polarization states derived from the lowest energy excitations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics (QM) fundamentals
  • Familiarity with string theory concepts
  • Knowledge of Lorentz invariance principles
  • Basic grasp of particle physics, specifically massless particles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Lorentz invariance in quantum field theory
  • Explore the mathematical framework of string theory, focusing on open strings
  • Learn about the role of creation and annihilation operators in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the properties of massless particles in various dimensions
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those interested in quantum mechanics, string theory, and the behavior of massless particles.

No Upper Bound
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I may have poorly titled this post, since the lecture I'm talking about isn't just about tachyons, really. What I'm referring to is what Leonard Susskind says between the 50-60 minute mark:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCyImLu0HSI&feature=youtu.be&t=46m30s

In the video, Susskind concludes that there are the only two polarization states of the first excited state of the open string, so then this string must be massless, like a photon. For this to happen, the ground state must have a negative mass squared.

Why must m_0^2 +1 =0 and how do we know that the a's and the b's represent the only two polarization states? I understand that if there are only two polarization states, then the particle must be massless to preserve Lorentz invariance, but the rest is confusing to me.

Can someone clear this up for me? I have no formal exposure to QM (and I apologize for this); regardless, I will try to decipher any technical answer given. Thanks so much.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The example that Susskind takes is the simplified case of massless photons in 4 dimensions. A massless photon in 4 dimensions has only 2 polarizations (so are a_i/a_i^+ and b_i/b_i^+, which are the anihilation/creation operators, for different excitation of energy i, corresponding to the 2 possible polarizations X and Y), but in a D space-time dimension, a massless photon has (D-2) polarizations. For instance, in the bosonic open string, the coherent dimension is D=26, so you have 24 possible polarizations. But the logic is the same, the excitations are vectors, that is from the ground state |0\rangle, and applying creation operators for the lowest energy excitation, we have states (\alpha^\mu)^+_1 ~|0\rangle with \mu = 1...D-2. Susskind notations correspond to a = \alpha^1, b= \alpha^2. The subscript _1, in (a^\mu)^+_1 means that we consider only the lowest energy excitation. The energy of these excited states is m_0^2+1, and it is also the squared mass of this state, which must be zero, so we have m_0^2+1=m^2=0
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K