Spectroscopy: What Do I See When I Combine Red & Green Beams?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MaWM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectroscopy
AI Thread Summary
Combining red and green monochromatic beams results in a yellow beam, but passing it through a spectroscope typically reveals only the original red and green bands due to the linear nature of the system. Nonlinear systems can produce additional frequencies, but a well-functioning spectroscope will primarily show the two original colors. Human perception complicates this, as our eyes interpret both the combined light and monochromatic yellow as the same color due to the way our color sensors work. The discussion emphasizes that a good spectroscope performs a Fourier Transform, confirming that linear combinations will not yield new spectral lines. Ultimately, the perception of color is influenced by both the physical properties of light and the biological response of the human visual system.
MaWM
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
I have two monochromatic beams, one green, one red. I combine the beams together and get a single yellow beam. I pass the yellow beam through a spectroscope and determine its spectrum. What do I see?

A red band and a green band? A yellow band?

I suspect that what I'd see is: A green band, a red band, a yellow band, a very low frequency band that is a carrier for the yellow, and other weaker bands that represent higher harmonics of the red+green combination. Can anyone confirm this?

By the way, the low frequency carrier that I am suspecting will appear comes from the sum-to-product trig identity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_trigonometric_identities" The sum of the green and red cause a product of a yellow and a low frequency envelope.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If your spectroscope is a linear system (which it should be!) then you will just get two lines, red and green.

The only way you can get anything else is if something in the system has a nonlinear response. For a nonlinear system, an input (A sin w1 t + B sin w2 t) can produce output including terms like (C sin w1 t + D sin w2 t)^2.

That squared term contains a term like E sin w1t sin w2t which (using your trig identity) is equivalent to two waves at new frequencies, F sin (w1+w2)t + G sin (w1-w2)t

Your eyes and brain are a nonlinear system for analysing light waves. That's why you see "red+green" as yellow, and you also see monochromatic yellow light as yellow.

A good spectroscope should be almost perfectly linear, so the constants C D E F and G will be very small compared with A and B and you will get just two lines in the spectrum, red and green.
 
Alephzero is correct, you need a medium with a nonlinear response to generate new frequencies.

http://www.rp-photonics.com/sum__and_difference_frequency_generation.html

Claude.
 
So, a good spectroscope essentially performs a Fourier Transform on the incoming signal. And, because of the uniqueness of the Fourier Transform, a linear combination of red and green will never give anything besides red and green?

But its our eye that somehow aliases the signal..
 
My biology knowledge is pretty basic but AFAIK human eyes have three color sensor systems (for red green and blue) which have a fairly broad bandwith. If monochromatic yellow light excites both the red and green sensors, or monochromatic red+green causes the same output, the brain doesn't know the difference and they both "look the same".

Correct, a good spectroscope essentially does an FFT.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
I don't need cloth simulation. I need to simulate clothing meshes. Made of triangles and I need an answer that someone with High School math can understand. I am actually using the time it takes for someone to answer to create a model with less geometry than the one I have been using. I want clothing that can be removed on a model that will be animated. I don't need stretching or wrinkles on my meshes, I just need gravity. I have an idea of how I could do it, but I don't know how to apply...
Back
Top