Speed at which two charges collide

  • Thread starter Thread starter djrkeys4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a point charge B as it collides with a stationary point charge A, considering their respective charges and masses. The user initially attempts to derive an acceleration function but struggles with time-dependent equations and the implications of infinite acceleration as the charges approach each other. They question whether converting potential energy to kinetic energy is a valid approach, noting that potential energy approaches negative infinity as the distance decreases. A new idea is proposed to calculate the time it takes for the moving charge to collide with the stationary charge, suggesting the possibility of using limits to solve the problem. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of the scenario and the challenges in applying standard energy conservation principles.
djrkeys4
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Point charge A of mass m for which q=-Q is held in place as point charge B of mass m for which q=+Q is released from rest at a distance x. What is the speed of charge B as it collides with charge a? (This isn't an actual problem we have, just something that I was wondering as we're starting E&M)

Homework Equations



Fe=kqq/r^2

E=kqq/r

Potential energy = Kinetic energy

The Attempt at a Solution



I started out with an a(x) equation but didn't get beyond that as I couldn't find how to work with functions of time instead of position. Can you do this by just converting the potential energy at rest to kinetic energy? I feel like there should be more to it because the acceleration goes to infinity as b gets closer and closer to a.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just gave it some more thought and realized the U -> KE idea doesn't make sense (U increases as x decreases)... can anyone point me in the right direction?
 
Alright, new idea: would it be easier instead to find the time it takes for a positive charge to collide with a negative charge that is held in place a distance r away from where the positive charge starts?

It's probably easier to find the time it takes the moving charge to move from r to r-x away from the stationary charge, so to find it could we take the limit as x approaches r of some equation? I have no idea what that would be, though.
 
djrkeys4 said:

Homework Statement



Point charge A of mass m for which q=-Q is held in place as point charge B of mass m for which q=+Q is released from rest at a distance x. What is the speed of charge B as it collides with charge a? (This isn't an actual problem we have, just something that I was wondering as we're starting E&M)

Homework Equations



Fe=kqq/r^2

E=kqq/r

Potential energy = Kinetic energy

The Attempt at a Solution



I started out with an a(x) equation but didn't get beyond that as I couldn't find how to work with functions of time instead of position. Can you do this by just converting the potential energy at rest to kinetic energy? I feel like there should be more to it because the acceleration goes to infinity as b gets closer and closer to a.
Hello djrkeys4. Welcome to PF !

I doubt that you will ever see this problem in a textbook. The potential energy → -∞ as x → 0 . Therefore, the kinetic energy → +∞ as x → 0 .
djrkeys4 said:
Alright, new idea: would it be easier instead to find the time it takes for a positive charge to collide with a negative charge that is held in place a distance r away from where the positive charge starts?

It's probably easier to find the time it takes the moving charge to move from r to r-x away from the stationary charge, so to find it could we take the limit as x approaches r of some equation? I have no idea what that would be, though.
I haven't worked it out, but I'm pretty sure that it is possible to find the time it takes for the particles to collide.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top