Speed increases mass, which increases gravity?

ledzeppie
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
So if speed increases mass as it approaches c, does the added mass increase the curvature of space-time? The reason why this question is making me confused is because the mass is only increased to an outside observer. Could anyone clarify this for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct. Relativistic mass does not contribute to the curvature of spacetime.
 
The source of gravity in GR is the stress-energy tensor which has 10 independent components, only one of which is mass. So mass, by itself, is not the source of gravity.
 
In SR, there is no gravity, and mass does not curve spacetime.

In GR, spacetime curvature is caused by the stress-energy tensor, whose components are frame dependent. The relativistic mass is one component of the stress-energy tensor in some frames, and so does curve spacetime. In frames in which there is no relativistic mass, this is made up for by changes in other components of the stress-energy tensor, so that the spacetime curvature remains the same regardless of frame.
 
Last edited:
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top