Speed of block as cylinder reaches bottom of circular track.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block and a cylinder interacting on a semicircular frictionless track. The block has a mass of 2 kg and the cylinder has a mass of 1 kg, with the cylinder being released from the top of the track. The goal is to determine the speed of the block when the cylinder reaches the bottom of the track, given specific parameters such as the radius of the track and gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of energy and momentum, questioning how kinetic energy is distributed between the block and the cylinder. There are attempts to calculate the speed of the cylinder and the block, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their calculations and the relationships between variables.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the setup and the application of physical principles. Some have pointed out potential misunderstandings in the problem statement and are exploring the implications of energy conservation and momentum conservation. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or solution yet.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the interpretation of the problem statement, particularly concerning the speed being sought. Additionally, participants note the lack of clarity on how the kinetic energy is shared between the two objects and the relevance of the cylinder's radius in the context of the problem.

takando12
Messages
122
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A block of mass M=2kg with a semicircular track of radius R=1.1m rests on a horizontal frictionless surface.A uniform cylinder of radius r=10cm and mass m=1kg is released from rest from the top most point .The cylinder slips on the semicircular frictionless track.The speed of the block when the cylinder reaches the bottom of the track is:(g=10m/s).
A)√10/3 B)√4/3 C)√5/2 D)√10.

Homework Equations


conservation of momentum.
vcentre of mass= v1m1 + v2m2/m1 +m2.

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not very sure how to solve it. I tried to calculate the speed of the cylinder at the bottom.
Consider the the bottom of the semicircular track to be h m above the surface. v1=0m/s
mg(h+1.1) -mgh= 1/2m(v22-v12)
2*10*1.1=v22.
v2=√22 m/s.
then using conservation of momentum, I tried to find the velocity of the block but the answer doesn't match.
How do I solve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
takando12 said:
mg(h+1.1) -mgh= 1/2m(v22-v12)
Can you explain your KE subexpression: 1/2m(v22-v12) ?
 
gneill said:
Can you explain your KE subexpression: 1/2m(v22-v12) ?
Sir,
I thought the change in the potential energy as it goes from the top to the bottom of the track will become the kinetic energy. Here v1=0m/s as it started from rest. Please do correct me if I am wrong.
 
And please do forgive me but the heading of the question is wrong. It is not the speed of the cylinder when it reaches the bottom , but the speed of the track when the cylinder reaches the bottom.
 
takando12 said:
I thought the change in the potential energy as it goes from the top to the bottom of the track will become the kinetic energy. Here v1=0m/s as it started from rest. Please do correct me if I am wrong.
Yes, energy conservation is applicable. What I'm wondering about is how you account for the fact that the KE will be split between the cylinder and block... there won't be just one velocity involved, and the initial velocity won't be one of them...
takando12 said:
And please do forgive me but the heading of the question is wrong. It is not the speed of the cylinder when it reaches the bottom , but the speed of the track when the cylinder reaches the bottom.
I've altered the title accordingly.
 
gneill said:
Yes, energy conservation is applicable. What I'm wondering about is how you account for the fact that the KE will be split between the cylinder and block... there won't be just one velocity involved, and the initial velocity won't be one of them...

I've altered the title accordingly.
Oh so the kinetic energy splits between the block and the cylinder? I have no idea how to proceed.
The only other formula we were taught is the shift in the centre of mass position. Here the shift will be zero as no external force is applied. But even if we do find the displacement of the centre of mass of the block , we don't have time to solve for speed.
 
takando12 said:
Oh so the kinetic energy splits between the block and the cylinder? I have no idea how to proceed.
The only other formula we were taught is the shift in the centre of mass position. Here the shift will be zero as no external force is applied. But even if we do find the displacement of the centre of mass of the block , we don't have time to solve for speed.
The constancy of the X coordinate of the mass centre is directly related to another conservation law. What other conservation laws do you know that might be relevant?
 
even after applying conservation of momentum and energy, answer is not matching with any of the options...what to do??
 
COM said:
even after applying conservation of momentum and energy, answer is not matching with any of the options...what to do??
can relative velocity come into picture?
 
  • #10
i wonder what can be the use of the cylinder's radius?
 
  • #11
Welcome to PF!
COM said:
i wonder what can be the use of the cylinder's radius?
What is the change in height of the cylinder from the point of release to the when the cylinder is at the bottom of the track?
 
Last edited:
  • #12
COM said:
i wonder what can be the use of the cylinder's radius?
Is there a drawing? The picture I have in mind is that the release point for the cylinder is with its center level with the top surface of the block. How much below that position can the cylinder reach?

Now, you say that you have applied conservation of momentum. How have you applied it? What equation can you write to express it?
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K