Speed of box from ramp to floor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics of a box sliding down a frictionless ramp and onto a floor with friction. One participant believes the box retains the same speed at the bottom of the ramp as it does on the floor, while another argues that the vertical component of velocity is lost upon reaching the floor, affecting the initial speed on the horizontal surface. The conversion of vertical momentum to horizontal momentum is debated, with considerations of the ramp's angle and the box's dimensions influencing the outcome. The clarity of the problem is questioned, particularly regarding the information provided about the ramp's angle and the box's size. Ultimately, the ambiguity in the question leaves room for multiple interpretations of the correct approach.
HumanDrew
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey, so I just finished taking a physic's test and one of the question was interesting to me. I thought it was pretty simple but my friend did the problem a different way, so I'm wondering what's the correct way to do this problem. So a box is moving down a frictionless ramp and onto the floor. The floor has a coefficient of friction and you have to find the distance it travels before stopping. I said that the speed the box has at the bottom of the ramp is the same speed the box initially has on the floor. My friend says that the speed of the box from bottom of ramp decreases when it goes onto the horizontal floor because it's approaching the horizontal floor at an angle. He told me that the vertical component of the velocity at the bottom of the ramp would be gone once it reaches the floor and your initial velocity on the floor is just the horizontal component of the velocity at the bottom of the ramp. What's the correct way to do this problem? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HumanDrew said:
Hey, so I just finished taking a physic's test and one of the question was interesting to me. I thought it was pretty simple but my friend did the problem a different way, so I'm wondering what's the correct way to do this problem. So a box is moving down a frictionless ramp and onto the floor. The floor has a coefficient of friction and you have to find the distance it travels before stopping. I said that the speed the box has at the bottom of the ramp is the same speed the box initially has on the floor. My friend says that the speed of the box from bottom of ramp decreases when it goes onto the horizontal floor because it's approaching the horizontal floor at an angle. He told me that the vertical component of the velocity at the bottom of the ramp would be gone once it reaches the floor and your initial velocity on the floor is just the horizontal component of the velocity at the bottom of the ramp. What's the correct way to do this problem? Thanks!
The horizontal velocity as it leaves the ramp is determined by how much KE it has, which is equal to the change in PE as the box slides down the frictionless ramp from top to bottom.
 
It is hard to say how much of the vertical component of momentum p will get converted to horizontal p. If the angle was 90 degrees, the block would just crash and stop at the bottom of the ramp, with zero vertical p converted to horizontal p. If there was even a small curvature where ramp meets floor, more of the vertical p would get converted to horizontal. But with a sharp corner I am tempted to say your friend is closer to being right.
 
anorlunda said:
It is hard to say how much of the vertical component of momentum p will get converted to horizontal p. If the angle was 90 degrees, the block would just crash and stop at the bottom of the ramp, with zero vertical p converted to horizontal p. If there was even a small curvature where ramp meets floor, more of the vertical p would get converted to horizontal. But with a sharp corner I am tempted to say your friend is closer to being right.
Good point. We would need the angle of the ramp and the physical size of the box to start slowing it down with friction as the leading edge contacts the floor. Were those given in the problem?
 
berkeman said:
Good point. We would need the angle of the ramp and the physical size of the box to start slowing it down with friction as the leading edge contacts the floor. Were those given in the problem?
This is more of an introductory physic's class that's alegbra based so it shouldn't be too hard. But angle was given but the size of box was not
 
Hopefully your teacher accepts both answers. The question is not clear.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top