I Speed of Light from Car Headlights & Brake Lights

Tony Sims
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So there is lots of information on the Internet specifying that the speed of light from the headlights of a car traveling at 30mph is C and not C+30 because it is impossible to travel faster than light but what about the speed of light from the brake lights pointing backwards? Am I right in thinking that this would be C-30 or is it still C?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

The speed of light measured by any inertial (non-accelerating) observer in a vacuum is C. Just C. Always C.

There is probably a related question you will think to ask soon which relates to how you add velocities for objects. For example, say you have, two rocket ships on opposite sides of Earth traveling toward Earth at 0.8 C. Do they measure their speed relative to each other to be 1.6C? Nope:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Relativ/einvel.html
 
Tony Sims said:
So there is lots of information on the Internet specifying that the speed of light from the headlights of a car traveling at 30mph is C and not C+30 because it is impossible to travel faster than light

It's the other way around. It's impossible to travel faster than light because the speed of the light from the headlights doesn't depend on the speed of the car.

In other words, you start with the postulate that the speed of light is independent of the speed of the source. If you're an observer standing beside the road, and the car is moving along that road, you will always measure the same value ##c## for the speed of the light coming from the headlights. This is equivalent to the car being at rest and you moving towards or away from it. Therefore no matter how fast you move, you will always measure the same value ##c## for the speed of light.

From there you can deduce that speed ##c## must also be your maximum possible speed. It goes something like this. Imagine chasing after a beam of light. No matter how fast your pursuit the beam will always recede from you at speed ##c##. Therefore you can never catch it.
 
  • Like
Likes stoomart
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
642
Replies
53
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top