Speed of Light in a Medium: Explained

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the speed of light in different media, specifically addressing the phenomenon of light traveling faster than in a vacuum under certain conditions, such as in cesium. Participants explore the implications of this observation, including concepts like dispersion and anomalous dispersion, and how these relate to established principles of physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the speed of light is always ##c## in a vacuum and less in any medium, challenging the idea that it can exceed this speed in cesium.
  • Others explain that in certain media, such as ultra-cold cesium, light can exhibit anomalous dispersion, allowing for different frequencies to travel in a coordinated manner that appears to exceed the speed of light.
  • A participant uses the analogy of a Mexican wave in a stadium to illustrate how a wave can propagate faster than the speed of light without any actual information or matter traveling faster than light.
  • There is a recognition that the phenomenon of anomalous dispersion is complex and has significant implications for discussions about the speed of light.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of light speed in cesium and the implications of anomalous dispersion. There is no consensus on whether the speed of light can be considered to exceed its vacuum speed under these conditions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the need for careful definitions and assumptions when discussing the speed of light in various media, particularly regarding the conditions necessary for anomalous dispersion and the implications for relativity.

Papo1111
Messages
12
Reaction score
5
I know that the speed of light is different in different mediums. The speed of light in Cesium as a medium is actually higher than the speed of light in vacuum. How is that possible? Shouldn't it be fastest in vacuum?
[Mentors note: this post has been lightly edited as part of splitting it out from another thread]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not a lie, just an oversimplification.

In some media such as glass, different frequencies of light travel at different speeds, a phenomenon called "dispersion". In some media, such as extremely carefully prepared clouds of ultra-cold caesium atoms, you get "anomalous dispersion". In media with anomalous dispersion you can get different frequencies to travel in such a way that they interfere to make a hump that "moves" smoothly along at any speed. But, crucially, the laser beam has to be already propagating all the way along where you want the hump to appear, and must be carefully pre-prepared.

This analogy is not perfect, but have you ever seen a Mexican wave in a sports stadium? One column of the audience stands up, and sits down as the column next to them stand up. A wave propagates around the arena like this. Its speed depends on how long it takes your average person to react to the person next to them moving and to stand up themselves. But, instead of doing it spontaneously, you could give everyone a watch and tell them: column 1 stands up at 12 o'clock, column 2 stands up at one quarter of a second past 12, column 3 at two quarter seconds past, and so on. The wave would go faster. And faster if you used tenths of a second instead of quarters, or hundredths of a second instead of tenths. Eventually, if you carry on shortening the time interval, the wave speed would exceed the speed of light (in principle - in reality, the precision necessary is well beyond human reaction capability). But that's fine because nothing is moving or communicating faster than light - the people are just executing pre-planned instructions to make a hump that "travels" while nothing is actually traveling in the direction the wave "moves".

This experiment is enormously more sophisticated than that, and it has highly technical implications for how one should talk about the speed of light in media with anomalous dispersion. But it's no challenge to relativity because it's not very different from the timed-Mexican-wave phenomenon.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nitsuj, vanhees71, CWatters and 1 other person
Papo1111 said:
I know that the speed of light is different in different mediums. The speed of light in Cesium as a medium is actually higher than the speed of light in vacuum. How is that possible? Shouldn't it be fastest in vacuum?
[Mentors note: this post has been lightly edited as part of splitting it out from another thread]
You're right: the speed of light is ##c## in vacuum, always less in a medium.

The experiment referenced in the link isn't demonstrating anything like what we usually mean when we talk about "faster than light". As I mentioned in your other thread, we have some older threads discussing what is going here in more detail. (Or you could just read @Ibix's post above, which landed while I was still writing this one)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Papo1111
Ibix said:
It's not a lie, just an oversimplification.

In some media such as glass, different frequencies of light travel at different speeds, a phenomenon called "dispersion". In some media, such as extremely carefully prepared clouds of ultra-cold caesium atoms, you get "anomalous dispersion". In media with anomalous dispersion you can get different frequencies to travel in such a way that they interfere to make a hump that "moves" smoothly along at any speed. But, crucially, the laser beam has to be already propagating all the way along where you want the hump to appear, and must be carefully pre-prepared.

This analogy is not perfect, but have you ever seen a Mexican wave in a sports stadium? One column of the audience stands up, and sits down as the column next to them stand up. A wave propagates around the arena like this. Its speed depends on how long it takes your average person to react to the person next to them moving and to stand up themselves. But, instead of doing it spontaneously, you could give everyone a watch and tell them: column 1 stands up at 12 o'clock, column 2 stands up at one quarter of a second past 12, column 3 at two quarter seconds past, and so on. The wave would go faster. And faster if you used tenths of a second instead of quarters, or hundredths of a second instead of tenths. Eventually, if you carry on shortening the time interval, the wave speed would exceed the speed of light (in principle - in reality, the precision necessary is well beyond human reaction capability). But that's fine because nothing is moving or communicating faster than light - the people are just executing pre-planned instructions to make a hump that "travels" while nothing is actually traveling in the direction the wave "moves".

This experiment is enormously more sophisticated than that, and it has highly technical implications for how one should talk about the speed of light in media with anomalous dispersion. But it's no challenge to relativity because it's not very different from the timed-Mexican-wave phenomenon.

Wow. This is the best explenation I've ever heard. Thak you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K