Speed of Light: Length Contraction & 20AU Paths

EbolaHost
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
traveling at the ~speed of light leads to length contraction.
based on that wouldn't a 20AU path be shorter if traveled at speeds near the speed of light ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EbolaHost said:
traveling at the ~speed of light leads to length contraction.
based on that wouldn't a 20AU path be shorter if traveled at speeds near the speed of light ?

Yes. However that doesn't change the speed of light. Because of time dilation both the traveler (who sees the distance contracted) and an observer at rest relative to the endpoints of the traveler's journey will find that a flash of light travels between the two points at the speed of light - divide the contracted length by the dilated time and you'll get ##c##.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top