Speed of Light Thought Experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a thought experiment involving a long object rotated to exceed the speed of light at its far end. It clarifies that information about the motion of one end of the object is transmitted to the other end at the speed of sound in the material, not faster than light. As rotational speed increases, the torque required also increases, preventing the object from reaching light speed. Additionally, if the object is not rigid, it will deform under stress, and the far end will not move simultaneously with the near end. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the limitations imposed by material properties and the fundamental laws of physics.
Spoink
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What would happen if you were to construct a massively lengthy object (Suppress your inner perv for a moment please) and rotated it so that the part of the object farthest away from you would theoretically move faster than light?
 
Science news on Phys.org
This is a very common misconception frequently brought up here. Any information concerning the motion of end A is transmitted to end B at the speed of sound in the material. If you make an effort, say with a sledge hammer, to move the stick at a speed faster then sound in the material you will simply deform the end while the vibrations created will travel away at the speed of sound.

BTW, the speed of sound in materials is MUCH smaller then the speed of light.
 
...For rotating objects, you'll find that the torque required to get it to rotate keeps increasing as the rotational speed increases, and you'll never get to C. It's the rotational equivalent of the linear speed 'barrier'.
 
Also the material stress in the rod becomes infinite.
 
Ok, so we attempt to spin a long rod. If the rod is not rigid then if we push the short end to hard the longer end will not stay straight but will bend. This leads me to the conclusion that the far end of any rod will not move at the same time as the short end. I well bet (with no real proof) that the wave of information moving to the far end of the rod will travel at the speed of sound in the rod. If you attempt to accelerate the short end faster then some value determined by the material the rod will either deform or break.

example, http://www.physicscentral.com/experiment/physicsathome/images/towers-falling.jpg"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the answers. I'm not incredibly well read but am steadily learning and hopefully such misconceptions will be erased from my world view as I gather more knowledge. :)
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
16K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top