Speed of Particle: Conservation of Momentum & Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter mike217
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem involving a particle of rest mass m accelerated to kinetic energy K, colliding with a stationary target particle of the same mass. For part 'a', the goal is to demonstrate that the speed of the center of mass is given by the formula \(\gamma v/(\gamma +1)\) and to confirm its validity in the non-relativistic limit. In part 'b', the task is to show that the mass M of the resulting composite from a perfectly inelastic collision is \(M=m\sqrt{2(\gamma +1)}\) and verify this in the non-relativistic case. Participants suggest using conservation of momentum and energy principles to set up the necessary equations for both parts. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the momentum and energy before and after the collision.
mike217
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Can you please give me a few pointers on this problem.

A particle of rest mass m is accelerated to a kinetic energy K in a nuclear reactor. This particle is incident on a stationary target particle, also of rest mass m.

a) Show that the speed of the centre of mass (that is the speed of the frame in which the total momentum is zero) is \gamma v/(\gamma +1) where v is the speed of the incident particle and \gamma =(1-v^2/c^2)^-1/2. Verify that this expression reduces to the usual one in the non relativistic case when v<<c.

b) If the collision is perfectly inelastic-show by using the conservation of energy and momentum that the mass M of the resulting composite is M=m\sqrt{2(\gamma +1)} Verify that this reduces to the usual value in the non relativistic case v<<c.

For part 'a' I get by writing the conservation of momentum:

Pbefore=mv/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2} and Pafter=MV/\sqrt{1-V^2/c^2} after that I am stuck on what to do.

For part 'b' I get,

mc^2/\sqrt{(1-v^2/c^2)} + mc^2=Mc^2/\sqrt{(1-V^2/c^2)}

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Please you don't have to solve this question. I just need a few tips on how to proceed, i.e. which particle to take as one having zero momentum etc.

Thank you.
 


Sure, here are some pointers to help you with this problem:

a) To start, you can use the conservation of momentum in the x-direction to set up an equation:

Pbefore = Pafter

where Pbefore is the momentum of the incident particle and Pafter is the momentum of the resulting composite. You can also use the definition of momentum P = mv/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2} to rewrite this equation as:

mv/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2} = MV/\sqrt{1-V^2/c^2}

Then, you can solve for V in terms of v and M by rearranging the equation. Once you have V in terms of v and M, you can use the definition of \gamma to simplify the expression and get the desired result.

b) For this part, you can use the conservation of energy and momentum to set up two equations:

Energy before = Energy after
Momentum before = Momentum after

Using the definitions of energy E = \sqrt{m^2c^4 + p^2c^2} and momentum P = mv/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}, you can rewrite these equations in terms of v and V. Then, you can solve for V in terms of v and M, and use the definition of \gamma to simplify the expression and verify the result.

Hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top