Speed of satellite in geosynchronous orbit

AI Thread Summary
To derive the speed of a satellite in geosynchronous orbit without using altitude or radius, one must focus on forces and uniform circular motion. The discussion highlights concerns about potentially using rotational kinematics, which is prohibited for this assignment. A participant expresses uncertainty about their solution, specifically regarding the use of formulas related to period and centripetal motion. Another contributor reassures that the approach seems valid but advises caution in confirming the absence of rotational kinematics. The emphasis remains on adhering strictly to the assignment guidelines to avoid losing credit.
glennib
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Derive an equation and solve for the speed of a satellite in geosynchronous orbit. You may NOT use the value of the satellite's altitude or radius in your calculations. If you do, you will receive no credit.

  • You should use your knowledge of forces and uniform circular motion for this assignment.
  • DO NOT use the rotational kinematics from chapter 10. If you do you will receive NO credit.
  • DO NOT attempt to apply Kepler's Laws. If you do you will receive NO credit.


Homework Equations


I have arrived at a solution, but I suspect that I have used rotational kinematics. Can someone confirm or dismiss this?


The Attempt at a Solution


Here is a screenshot from my Maple work. It is relationship1 (1) and (2) that I am worried about.
jk7lT4o.jpg


Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
glennib said:
I have arrived at a solution, but I suspect that I have used rotational kinematics. Can someone confirm or dismiss this?

Here is a screenshot from my Maple work. It is relationship1 (1) and (2) that I am worried about.

If I recall, rotational kinematics is full of ω's, and such associated terms. Step 1 is the formula for a period, and step 2 is just the application of centripetal motion.

I think your work in regards to your rules/restrictions looks fine, but I strongly advise you not to take my word for it, and just double check that my suggestions are valid.
 
Actually, I just remembered that rotational velocity = v/r, and that rotational acceleration = a/r. So yeah, if that helps, use it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top