Speed of sound in steel vs air

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The speed of sound in steel is approximately 16,400 feet/sec, while in air it is about 1,100 feet/sec. The moderator's assertion that sound travels faster in steel due to its higher elasticity is debated; the key factor is actually the stiffness of the material. While density plays a role, it is the ability of steel to transmit sound waves rapidly due to its stiffness that primarily influences sound speed. The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between elasticity and stiffness in material science.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of material properties: elasticity and stiffness
  • Basic knowledge of sound wave propagation in different media
  • Familiarity with the equations governing sound speed in solids and gases
  • Concept of isentropic processes in thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between stiffness and sound speed in materials
  • Explore the equations for sound speed in solids (cs = √(κ/ρ)) and gases (ca = 20.05√(T/K))
  • Study the differences between elasticity and stiffness in engineering contexts
  • Investigate how temperature affects the speed of sound in gases
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, material scientists, and engineers interested in acoustics and the properties of materials. This discussion is particularly beneficial for those looking to deepen their understanding of sound propagation in different media.

Thecla
Messages
137
Reaction score
10
I saw on a web page a video of tiny Agnes Scott College vs Princeton University from 1966 on GE College Bowl.Agnes Scott won (!), but one of the questions that both schools got wrong was
asked by the moderator:
The speed of sound in air is about 1,100 feet/sec. The speed of sound in steel is about 16,400 feet/sec.
Why does sound pass through steel faster than air?
Princeton answered because steel was denser.
Agnes Scott said that the molecules of steel were closer together.
The moderator said both answers were incorrect.
The moderator said the correct answer was that steel was more elastic than air.
Can someone explain this answer of the moderator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi Thecla

Thecla said:
Princeton answered because steel was denser.

that is incorrect without other comments ... increasing density decreases the speed of sound through it
Thecla said:
Agnes Scott said that the molecules of steel were closer together.

that is partly correct but again needs further insight
Thecla said:
The moderator said the correct answer was that steel was more elastic than air.

The moderator is correct

Elasticity is the materials ability to rebound after the sound wave passes through it. In a rigid material like steel, the atoms are tightly
bound together by strong forces and this allows them to come back to their original position quickly. This high elasticity. Don't confuse this with high flexibility, eg. as in a piece of rubber ... it is highly
flexible, but has low elasticity. that is, it won't return to its original position/shape as quickly, if at all.

Sound does move through a denser material/medium better than a less dense material/medium

eg through a solid better than a liquid and through a liquid better than through air/any gas
But the elasticity of the material is the overriding factor.hope that helpsDave
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and Bandersnatch
I had no doubt the moderator was correct and density seems like a good guess.The students must have been thrown off by the general statement that speeds are faster in solids than liquids and faster in liquids than gasses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Thecla said:
The moderator said the correct answer was that steel was more elastic than air.
The moderator was incorrect as well. The property of elasticity is not the right one either. The ability to rebound from a deformation is not key for the speed of sound. The stiffness of a material is key.

The property of elasticity is what allows a tuning fork to vibrate for a long time.
The property of stiffness is what allows a tuning fork to vibrate rapidly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu, Chestermiller and russ_watters
jbriggs444 said:
The moderator was incorrect as well. The property of elasticity is not the right one either. The ability to rebound from a deformation is not key for the speed of sound. The stiffness of a material is key.

The property of elasticity is what allows a tuning fork to vibrate for a long time.
The property of stiffness is what allows a tuning fork to vibrate rapidly.
Right; it's large forces (in the bonds) that cause rapid acceleration and deceleration, not conservation of elastic energy.

There could be a secondary meaning of "highly elastic" though, meaning high modulus of elasticity.

..but either way, the colloquial use of "elastic" is basically the opposite of what it would mean scientifically/in an engineering sense. Steel is more elastic than rubber in both ways.
 
jbriggs444 said:
The moderator was incorrect as well. The property of elasticity is not the right one either. The ability to rebound from a deformation is not key for the speed of sound. The stiffness of a material is key.

The property of elasticity is what allows a tuning fork to vibrate for a long time.
The property of stiffness is what allows a tuning fork to vibrate rapidly.
Yes, I totally agree. For the isentropic expansions and compressions characteristic of ideal sound waves in air, air can be regarded as being just as elastic as steel (or at least in the same sense as steel).
 
The speed of sound in a solid is
cs = √(κ/ρ) (κ = modus and ρ is density)
so the speed relies on two factors and not just one.
The speed in air is given by
ca = 20.05√(T/K) (T is the absolute temperature and K is Boltzmann's constant)
So the question was poorly chosen if the quiz required a simple answer because there are a different set of quantities involved in the simple classical values of both speeds. I can't think of a straightforward answer to this but the question gets asked and the phenomenon gets "explained" a lot in elementary Science.
Yet another example of where Physics gets trivialised. I imagine that the speed in steel vapour (i.e. very hot) could be more similar to the speed in air of the same temperature - the factor 20.05 would be different I guess.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K