Speed of Spherical Waves: How Fast is v?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the speed of spherical waves, specifically the meaning of "v" in the wavefunction equation. It clarifies that in a non-dispersive medium, phase, group, and front velocities are equivalent, and "v" represents the group velocity in this context. However, the term "group velocity" typically does not account for spherical symmetry, leading to ambiguity in terminology. Observers at a fixed location will see wavefronts moving at speed "v," similar to plane waves. The conversation also touches on formatting issues with equations in different browsers.
pardesi
Messages
337
Reaction score
0
what do we mean when we sy the speed of spherical waves is v
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pardesi said:
what do we mean when we sy the speed of spherical waves is v

There are several definitions. Phase velocity, group velocity, front velocity. If there is no dispersion and no loss, all these give the same.
 
when we write the equation of sphericcal wavefunctions \psi(r,t)=\frac{f(r-vt)}{r} what does v here mean
 
pardesi said:
when we write the equation of sphericcal wavefunctions \psi(r,t)=\frac{f(r-vt)}{r} what does v here mean

As I said, if its a non-dispersive medium phase=group=front velocity. From your definition, f(x) represents a kind of wave group and so v is the group velocity. But on the other hand the term group velocity doesn't refer to spherical symmetry, but rather to pure translation. So maybe there is no established term for this.
 
pardesi said:
when we write the equation of sphericcal wavefunctions \psi(r,t)=\frac{f(r-vt)}{r} what does v here mean

It means the same thing as with a plane wave. If you "stand" at a fixed location anywhere and watch the wavefronts (surfaces of constant phase) go past you, they are moving at speed v.

(By the way, equations embedded into text line up better with the text if you use "itex" instead of "tex" in the tags.)
 
thanks
 
jtbell said:
It means the same thing as with a plane wave. If you "stand" at a fixed location anywhere and watch the wavefronts (surfaces of constant phase) go past you, they are moving at speed v.

(By the way, equations embedded into text line up better with the text if you use "itex" instead of "tex" in the tags.)

not necessarily if you're viewing with Firefox on linux or Mac.
 
I'm using Firefox (2.0.0.1) on a Mac (OS 10.4.10) right now. I haven't noticed any problems with the last few versions (at least) of either of these.
 
jtbell said:
I'm using Firefox (2.0.0.1) on a Mac (OS 10.4.10) right now. I haven't noticed any problems with the last few versions (at least) of either of these.

testing 1, 2, 3 ...

hmmm, looks like you're right. I'm using my daughters' iMac.

but I'm pretty certain, using Firefox under Fedora linux, (which is what i have at work), that even with itex, the expressions get elevated a little from the baseline of the text.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
@jtbell
well one doubt more
then can we define wavefunctions as functions which satisfy
\Nabla^{2}=\frac{\delta^{2} \psi}{v^{2}\delta t^{2}} for some constant v whixh sometimes turns out to be the phase velocity or for that matter group or front velocity
 
  • #11
jtbell said:
I'm using Firefox (2.0.0.1) on a Mac (OS 10.4.10) right now. I haven't noticed any problems with the last few versions (at least) of either of these.

jt, i just happened to check, and it's:

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060913 Fedora/1.5.0.7-1.fc5 Firefox/1.5.0.7 pango-text

the itex baseline is elevated about 1/2 line above the regular text baseline. don't know why that is, but I've been less impressed with linux than the hacker community.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
375
Replies
236
Views
13K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top