Speed of the light and time dilation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of time dilation and the speed of light, particularly in the context of special relativity. Participants explore how these concepts apply to different observers, including hypothetical scenarios involving planets and spaceships moving at significant fractions of the speed of light.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that time dilation occurs even at slow speeds, while others argue that the speed of light remains constant across all inertial frames, regardless of time dilation effects.
  • A participant raises a scenario involving Venus and Mars, questioning how different time dilation could imply different speeds of light, which is contested by others who emphasize the constancy of light speed.
  • One participant discusses a spaceship traveling at 30% of the speed of light, questioning how time dilation affects the perception of time and the speed of light from different frames of reference.
  • There is a discussion about the Lorentz factor and its implications for time experienced by observers in different frames, with some asserting that time inside the spaceship runs slower relative to an outside observer.
  • Participants clarify that, regardless of the observer's frame, the speed of light remains constant at c, and that time dilation affects the frequency of light rather than its speed.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the implications of relativity, particularly regarding the speed of light as perceived by different observers, leading to further questions about the nature of light in moving frames.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement on several points, particularly regarding the implications of time dilation on the speed of light and the interpretation of relativistic effects in different frames of reference. There is no consensus on the interpretations presented, and multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on specific assumptions about the reference frames and the nature of observations, which may not be universally agreed upon. The discussion also touches on the complexities of relativity, including time dilation, length contraction, and the relativity of simultaneity, without resolving these complexities.

sejyne
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Lorenz-factor has remarkable influence at speeds near to light, but formula itself has no limits. So, time dilation occurs also with slow speeds.

From my point of view (an observer), Venus and Mars have different speeds which means different time dilation and this means different speed of light.

So, both planets are sending a ray of light towards me with different speeds. - Which is not possible.

If time dilation would be an imaginary phenomenon, there wouldn't be any problems. But when two worlds with different time dilation meets each others, there is a problem.

What explains this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Lorentz transformation applies to objects moving at less than the speed of light. Light itself has the same speed in all inertial frames.
 
"But when two worlds with different time dilation meets each others, there is a problem."

That would be a problem except that light is literally, measurably, and physically always a local phenomenon. There is no observation of distant light. Measured, captured, seen light is always local light. In this respect, light as we know it (always local) is consistently well behaved.
 
sejyne said:
Lorenz-factor has remarkable influence at speeds near to light, but formula itself has no limits. So, time dilation occurs also with slow speeds.
Yes.

From my point of view (an observer), Venus and Mars have different speeds which means different time dilation and this means different speed of light.
No. A fundamental point of relativity is that the speed of light is the same in all coordinate systems. Time dilation will affect the frequency of the light, not its speed.

So, both planets are sending a ray of light towards me with different speeds. - Which is not possible.

If time dilation would be an imaginary phenomenon, there wouldn't be any problems. But when two worlds with different time dilation meets each others, there is a problem.

What explains this?
 
Thank you, I got some idea - and perhaps understanding comes later.

Same matter but different example:

A spaceship is flying with a speed of 30% of the light and if I calculated right, Lorenz factor is 1,05. Does it mean that the time in spaceship goes 5% slower and "twin paradox" is on the way? He's hands and heart and everything moves 5% slower except the light?

Pilot puts the light on and the ray of light goes from lamp to the window. If he checks, how much time this takes, does he's watch give the value in seconds as on the earth?
 
sejyne said:
Thank you, I got some idea - and perhaps understanding comes later.

Same matter but different example:

A spaceship is flying with a speed of 30% of the light
The whole point of the name "relativity" is that it makes no sense to say "speed 30% of the speed of light" without say what this is measured relative to. I assume you are postulating some observer so that the spaceship is flying at 30% of the speed of light relative to that observer.

and if I calculated right, Lorenz factor is 1,05. Does it mean that the time in spaceship goes 5% slower and "twin paradox" is on the way? He's hands and heart and everything moves 5% slower except the light?
Relative to the outside observer, yes. As far as a person in the spaceship is concerned, there is no change.

Pilot puts the light on and the ray of light goes from lamp to the window. If he checks, how much time this takes, does he's watch give the value in seconds as on the earth?

The pilot is motionless relative to the spaceship so he sees the light moving at c. The outside observer sees the light moving at speed
\frac{u+ c}{1+ \frac{uc}{c^2}}= \frac{u+ c}{1+ \frac{u}{c}}
Multiplying both numerator and denominator by c,
\frac{(u+ c)c}{c+ u}= c

That is, both pilot and the outside observer see light moving at speed c. That is exactly what "the speed of light is the same in any coordinate system" means.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think I've got rid of one problem.

In my example the spaceship moves with a speed of 30% from 299.792.458m/s. Inside the ship, after the pilot's opinion, the light is moving 5% faster, 314.267.888m/s. When the ship goes 99% of light, the pilot's speed indicator shows 2.125.172.389m/s.

---

The "speed indicator" of the Earth has also some variation. In what month the light goes as fastest?
 
sejyne said:
In my example the spaceship moves with a speed of 30% from 299.792.458m/s.
OK, so your ship is moving at 0.3c with respect to something (the earth, for example).
Inside the ship, after the pilot's opinion, the light is moving 5% faster, 314.267.888m/s.
No, with respect to the ship, the light is seen to move at speed c, as usual.
When the ship goes 99% of light, the pilot's speed indicator shows 2.125.172.389m/s.
:confused:
 
I never believed this would be easy...

Base is the Earth and an observer is there. The spaceship moves with a speed of 30% from 299.792.458m/s and time inside the ship goes 5% slower than on the earth.

What is the speed of the light inside the space ship
a) after observer?
b) after pilot?
 
  • #10
sejyne said:
I never believed this would be easy...

Base is the Earth and an observer is there. The spaceship moves with a speed of 30% from 299.792.458m/s and time inside the ship goes 5% slower than on the earth.

What is the speed of the light inside the space ship
a) after observer?
b) after pilot?
a) 299 792 458 m/s
b) 299 792 458 m/s
Relativity doesn't just cause time dilation, it also causes length contraction and the relativity of simultaneity.
 
  • #11
DrGreg said:
Relativity doesn't just cause time dilation, it also causes length contraction and the relativity of simultaneity.
right!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K