Speed Pertaining to Circular Motion

AI Thread Summary
In circular motion, speed is calculated using the formula v = ω * r, where v is linear velocity in m/s, ω is angular velocity in rad/s, and r is the radius in meters. The confusion arises from the units, as radians are considered a unitless quantity because they represent the ratio of arc length to radius. Therefore, when calculating speed, the radian unit effectively cancels out, allowing for consistent units of m/s. This concept clarifies why the textbook calculations appear to omit radians. Understanding that radians are unitless simplifies the relationship between linear and angular motion.
Coop
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Units for Speed Pertaining to Circular Motion

Hi,

So v=ω*r

Where v = velocity in m/s
ω = angular velocity in rad/s
r = radius in m

But I am confused...the units don't match! What happens to the rad?

m/s = (rad/s)*s

My textbook doesn't explain it, it simply does calculations like (56.5 rad/s)(0.030 m) = 1.7 m/s and the rad disappears. I have a feeling I am missing something obvious o.O. Any help?

Thanks,
Coop
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The measure of an angle θ, in radians, is defined as the ratio of a circular arc subtending that angle θ to the radius of the circle. Angles thus have units of length per length. In other words, angle is a unitless quantity. Using radians makes the constant of proportionality one when computing arc length, or when computing speed along a circular path.
 
In other words, rads is not a unit. It's just a label.
 
Cool, thanks a lot guys, I wish my book explained that :p
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top