Speed skier travelling up a hill

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ly444999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hill Speed
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A speed skier traveling horizontally at 5.80 m/s approaches a hill with a 23.0° slope and a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.350. The skier's mass, including skis, is 77.0 kg. The calculations for the forces involved, including gravitational components and friction, were discussed, leading to an acceleration of -6.98650 m/s². The final distance traveled up the hill before stopping was incorrectly calculated as 4.81500 m due to a missing factor of 2 in the equation Vf² = Vi² + 2ad.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions (sine and cosine)
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations
  • Basic concepts of friction and its coefficients
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of kinematic equations, specifically Vf² = Vi² + 2ad
  • Study the effects of different coefficients of friction on motion
  • Explore the application of forces in inclined planes
  • Learn about the impact of angle of inclination on acceleration
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding dynamics involving friction and inclined planes.

Ly444999
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A speed skier is traveling horizontally at a constant speed of 5.80 m/s when she approaches a snow-covered hill that has a slope of 23.0° above the horizontal. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the skis and the hill is 0.350 and the combined mass of her and her skis is 77.0 kg. If she decided to glide up the hill, how far would she make it before she comes to a complete stop?

Homework Equations


Fnet = m*a
Fk = μ Fn
Fg = m(-g)
Fgx = m(-g)sinθ
Fgy = m(-g)cosθ

The Attempt at a Solution


So first I solved for the y component of the force due to gravity:
Fgx = (77.0kg)(-9.8m/s2)*cos23 = -694.61296

Then I solved for the kinetic friction with the the y component of the gravity force equaling the normal force:
Fk = (0.350)(-694.61296) = -243.11454

Then I went on to solve for acceleration using the Fnet formula with the x component of gravity subtracting the kinetic friction force:

m*a = Fgx - Fk
(77.0kg)*a = [(77.0kg)(-9.8m/s2)*sin23] - 243.11454
a = -6.98650

I was just wondering is this right so far?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ly444999 said:
is this right so far?
Looks right. (With that coefficient of friction for skis on snow, the skiing industry would collapse.)
 
haruspex said:
Looks right. (With that coefficient of friction for skis on snow, the skiing industry would collapse.)
So I am supposed to use negative 9.8 (or whatever decimal places I use), depending on whether I make up or down positive (I made down negative), on both x and y component?
Also is that Fnet equation right Fgx subtract Fk? I'm having a lot of doubts and confusions in my calculations from which value should be positive or negative.
 
Ly444999 said:
So I am supposed to use negative 9.8 (or whatever decimal places I use), depending on whether I make up or down positive (I made down negative), on both x and y component?
Also is that Fnet equation right Fgx subtract Fk? I'm having a lot of doubts and confusions in my calculations from which value should be positive or negative.
Clearly both the friction and the downslope component of gravity will contribute to the slowing of the skier, so the important thing is that they should have the same sign. The other main opportunity for errors is in confusion between sine and cosine, but I confirm you have that right too.
 
I plugged in that acceleration into Vf2 = Vi2 +2*a*d and I ended up getting 4.81500 m and that answer was wrong apparently did I do something wrong?
Final velocity I'm almost certain is 0.
Initial velocity was given at 5.80 m/s
acceleration I solved to be -6.98650

Edit: Oops I forgot to multiply the acceleration by 2 before I divided the initial velocity by that
 
Ly444999 said:
I plugged in that acceleration into Vf2 = Vi2 +2*a*d and I ended up getting 4.81500 m and that answer was wrong apparently did I do something wrong?
Final velocity I'm almost certain is 0.
Initial velocity was given at 5.80 m/s
acceleration I solved to be -6.98650
I get about half that. Did you forget the 2 in 2ad?
 
haruspex said:
I get about half that. Did you forget the 2 in 2ad?
Yeah I did ooops lol thanks for quick reply though.
 
Ly444999 said:
Yeah I did ooops lol thanks for quick reply though.
Ok. Fwiw, a typical coefficient for ski on snow would be less than 0.1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K