B Speed vs. time for our Galaxy and an Observer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effects of relative motion on time perception, using a hypothetical scenario where the Earth and solar system move at 1,000,000 mph. It emphasizes that in a specific frame of reference, one could appear stationary while moving at the same speed in the opposite direction. However, this perspective is arbitrary, as motion is relative and varies across different frames of reference. Observers in different frames will perceive time differently, with each party seeing the other's clocks as ticking slower. Ultimately, the conversation illustrates the symmetry of time dilation in relative motion scenarios.
zuz
Messages
100
Reaction score
36
Lets just say for the sake of argument that the earth, sun, solar system, galaxy were all moving due north at 1,000,000 miles an hour. If you were to travel due south at 1,000,000 mph you would basically be not moving at all. How would this affect time for you or anyone observing you?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zuz said:
Lets just say for the sake of argument that the earth, sun, solar system, galaxy were all moving due north at 1,000,000 miles an hour. If you were to travel due south at 1,000,000 mph you would basically be not moving at all. How would this affect time for you or anyone observing you?
Yes, there is a frame of reference such that if the solar system were moving at N mph in one direction and you were moving at N mph in the opposite direction IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM'S FRAME OF REFERENCE you would be stationary in the first FOR. So what? That's how motion works.

EDIT: If you mean that the solar system and you are moving in the SAME frame of reference then your statement that you would not be moving makes no sense, as that is NOT how motion works.
 
phinds said:
That's how motion works.
There is also this (tongue-in-cheek) theorem

Theorem
The center of mass of the Universe is at absolute rest.
Proof (reductio ad absurdum)
If it moved, where would it go?"
 
zuz said:
Lets just say for the sake of argument that the earth, sun, solar system, galaxy were all moving due north at 1,000,000 miles an hour.
You're just picking an arbitrary frame of reference here, but ok.
zuz said:
If you were to travel due south at 1,000,000 mph you would basically be not moving at all.
No, you'd be stationary in the frame of reference you chose arbitrarily earlier. In all other frames you're moving.
zuz said:
How would this affect time for you or anyone observing you?
Just the same as always. Your clocks look normal to you and everyone else's (well, those in motion relative to you) tick slow. Everyone else says their clocks look normal and yours tick slow. It's symmetric. No, that's not a contradiction.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'

Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'

(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
View full post »

Thread 'Do electron density waves accompany EM waves in coaxial cables?'

Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Absolute and relative motion/rest
Replies
16
Views
2K
I Determining a stationary point of reference to base all absolute motion
2
Replies
57
Views
3K
B Mobility in a Strong Gravity Environment vs. Moving Mass?
Replies
10
Views
1K
B Can the "creation" of space in the Universe affect the speed of light?
Replies
7
Views
3K
B How Do Points M and O' Move Relative to Point O in Space and Time?
Replies
25
Views
2K
I The Derivative Nature of Time and Its Relation to Earth's Rotation and Speed
Replies
38
Views
5K
A A pair of interesting papers: have counterarguments been published?
Replies
10
Views
2K
B A Scenic Trip as a Spaceship at 0.999...c, and questions that arise
Replies
36
Views
3K
I Does light escape the Universe?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I 2 objects of enormous volume each in relative motion very close to c
Replies
8
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top