Speed vs Velocity: What's the Difference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaysun_83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed Velocity
AI Thread Summary
Speed is defined as the magnitude of motion, while velocity includes both magnitude and direction, making it a vector. A change in direction, even with constant speed, results in a change in velocity due to its vector nature. For example, walking south at 1 m/s does not help in reaching a destination directly north, illustrating that correct velocity is crucial for reaching a goal. Additionally, any change in velocity, whether in magnitude or direction, constitutes acceleration. Understanding these distinctions is essential for grasping the concepts of motion in physics.
jaysun_83
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between speed and velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The usual meanings are that velocity is a vector, having magnitude and direction, while speed is just the magnitude of velocity.
 
Suppose you are heading east with a speed of 1 m/s. If you change your direction towards north but keep your speed=1 m/s, then though your speed has not changed, your velocity changes. This is because velocity depends both on the speed with which one is going, and the direction in which he/she is going.
So how does velocity make a difference when used instead of speed? Suppose that you have to go straight north with a speed x m/s to reach a shop. Now you get out of your home and start walking southwards. What is your speed? x m/s. But with this speed, are you ever going to reach your market? No (unless you are brave enough to walk the whole length of earth, to reach that point). Why? If you are traveling with the required speed, what is the problem in reaching the market? The problem is that your direction is wrong or, in other words, your velocity is just opposite to what you should actually have.
So, are you now able to grasp the difference between speed and velocity?

regards
Mr V
 
Mr Virtual said:
Suppose you are heading east with a speed of 1 m/s. If you change your direction towards north but keep your speed=1 m/s, then though your speed has not changed, your velocity changes.

Just to add something that might clear up misconceptions that appear to be common: that change of direction is an acceleration, even though the speed remains constant.
 
Yeah, thanks Mr. Virtual. And thanks for the addition Danger, understanding that change of direction is an acceleration explains a lot to me also.
 
No worries, mate. The whole point is that 'acceleration' is defined as a change of velocity. If either the magnitude or the vector changes, then the term applies.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
48
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top