Sphere melting/freezing timescale-scaling (simplest approach)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bzz77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approach Sphere
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating melting timescales for uniform spheres submerged in a hotter liquid, emphasizing a simplified scaling approach rather than complex numerical methods. The user seeks guidance on assumptions necessary for a reasonable approximation, including uniform temperature within the sphere and constant bath temperature. Key equations are provided to relate convection heat transfer to the melting process, incorporating factors like density, specific heat, and latent heat. The derived formula for the time required to melt the sphere is based on these assumptions, highlighting the importance of the convection coefficient and temperature differences. This analysis serves as a foundational step before exploring more intricate numerical solutions.
bzz77
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Sphere melting/freezing timescale--scaling (simplest approach)?

Hello everyone:

I am new to melting/freezing-type behaviour. I would like to calculate approximate melting timescales for spheres (uniform composition) thrown into a hotter liquid. The spheres would initially be at a lower temperature than their melting point, so they'd have to heat up before melting. I'd like to stick with conduction.

I would like to know if there's a simple scaling-type method (that incorporates latent heat) for getting approximate melting timescales. From my reading so far, it looks these sorts of Stefan problems are usually approached with numerical methods, and I'd like to start with simple scaling-based approximations before diving into the numerical methods!

If anyone could describe how I'd go about doing a reasonable, but simplified timescale calculation for a melting sphere, I'd be very grateful! I don't know where to start.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


It's all about the assumptions.

For example, I'll assume that each immersed sphere has a uniform temperature T(t) the entire time. In other words, conduction within the sphere is fast compared to convection between the sphere and the liquid. In other other words, the sphere is not too big, the thermal conductivity of the sphere material is not too small, and the convection coefficient is not too large. Calculate the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biot_number" to get a handle on whether this assumption makes sense.

I'll assume that the bath is large, so that the bath temperature T_b is constant.

I'll assume that all material properties are temperature-independent.

Convection from the liquid will deliver a thermal power of hA[T_b-T(t)]=h(4\pi r^2)[T_b-T(t)] to the sphere, where h is the convection coefficient and r is the radius. The energy that needs to be supplied to melt the sphere is \rho V[c(T_m-T_0)+L]=\rho(4\pi r^3/3)[c(T_m-T_0)+L], where \rho is the density, c is the specific heat capacity, T_0 and T_0 are the initial and melting temperatures, and L is the latent heat of melting.

Now I'll assume that the bath temperature is large compared to the melting temperature T_m and that the melting temperature isn't much larger than the starting sphere temperature T_0, so that T_b-T(t)\approx T_b-T_m and c(T_m-T_0)+L\approx L.

Then the time required to absorb this energy and melt the sphere entirely is

\tau=\frac{\rho r L}{h(T_b-T_m)}

This is just one example of a scaling analysis in heat transfer. Your assumptions may be different.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top