How can I demonstrate that the integral of vdP is used to calculate work in flow machines?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 3K views
Emmanuel S
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
I have this little doubt because in class, the professor said the work is equal to the integrate of vdP, but i don't know how to prove it, why it isn't PdV like those exercises in a cylinder-piston
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Chestermiller said:
Is your system a flow system, such that fluid is flowing into the system and out of the system through inlets and outlets to a control volume? An example would be a nozzle.

Indeed. In fact, the problem was with a reversible compressor; the process was polytropic, and after performing the mass and energy balance, when calculating the compressor's specific work, the professor established w = ∫ vdP

And he said that for flow machines, the work took that expression, not PdV.
 
from Moran, et al, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics I saw the balance explained
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller
Emmanuel S said:
Indeed. In fact, the problem was with a reversible compressor; the process was polytropic, and after performing the mass and energy balance, when calculating the compressor's specific work, the professor established w = ∫ vdP

And he said that for flow machines, the work took that expression, not PdV.
For a differential section of the compressor operating at steady state, the open system version of the first law of thermodynamics tells us the $$dW_s=dh=Tds-vdP$$ where h is the enthalpy per unit mass of gas, s is the entropy per unit mass, v is the volume per unit mass, and ##W_s## is the shaft work. For adiabatic reversible operation, ds = 0, so $$dW_s=vdP$$