SPHERICAL CAPACITOR - with two insulating shells

AI Thread Summary
A spherical capacitor consists of two insulating shells with different dielectric constants, positioned between inner and outer metallic shells. The problem involves calculating the potential difference between these shells, which can be approached by treating the system as three capacitors in series. The capacitances can be expressed using the dielectric constants and geometrical dimensions, leading to a combined capacitance equation. The discussion highlights the complexity of applying the spherical capacitance formula and suggests using integrals for a more accurate calculation. Overall, the solution requires careful consideration of the dielectric properties and geometry to determine the potential difference accurately.
Grommit
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
PLEASE HELP ASAP - Spherical capacitor

I could really use some help with this one, and I need to submit very soon...
Problem:
A spherical capacitor is made of two insulating spherical shells with different dielectric
constants K1 and K2 situated between two (inner and outer, shown by thick lines)
spherical metallic shells and separated by a vacuum gap. Geometrical dimensions of
the cross-section are as shown in figure 2. Outer metallic shell has charge +Q and the
inner metallic shell has charge −Q. What is the potential difference V between these
metallic shells?
Image: http://tinyurl.com/yazcvq2

If I am understanding this correctly, this can be interpreted as three capacitors connected in series. To that end, I thought I could utilize the equation for capacitors in series: 1/Ceq = 1/C1 + 1/C2 +1/C3. Then, Ceq=Q/V would indicate the potential difference. (Im thinking this may be flawed logic though).

Using K*(4*pi*Epsilon(0))*(a*b)/(b-a) for the spherical capacitances seems to be making a cumbersome mess of numbers more than anything.
Im starting to think now that maybe I should be setting up an integral along the lines of V=Q/(4*pi*Epsilon(0)) INTEGRAL (from a to b) db/b^2... hope that makes sense.
Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
FWIW, I found the problem partially worked out in this manner:
Basically you have 3 capacitors in series, the first has a dielectric K2 with a thickness b -a, the second has a vacuum dielectric with a thickness c-b and the third capacitor with a dielectric K3 with a thickness d -c.
C1 = K2/(b-a), C2 = 1/(c-b), and C3 = K1/(d-c)
1/Ct = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + 1/C3
1/Ct = (b-a)/K2 + (c-b) + (d-c)/K1
1/Ct = (K1(b-a) +K1(K2)(c-b) + K2(d-c))/K1(K2)
Ct = K1(K2)/(K1(b-a) +K1(K2)(c-b) + K2(d-c))
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/i...F112UmVhoyDA.YirA--&paid=add_comment#openions
However, this solution doesn't seem to have the variables for spherical capacitance included ==> K*(4*pi*Epsilon(0))*(a*b)/(b-a)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top