Spherical Harmonics Normalization

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the use of spherical harmonics to parametrize a magnetic field, specifically through the equations involving Legendre polynomials. The user is uncertain about the normalization of coefficients Cn,m and Sn,m, as they are presented in a linear format rather than a structured pyramid, complicating the identification of their corresponding indices. Clarification is sought on the starting point for summation in the series, particularly regarding the normalization of specific terms like C1,1 and S1,1. The user has consulted Wikipedia for resources but finds the explanations insufficient. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for a clearer understanding of spherical harmonics normalization in this context.
Dzyubak
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello, everyone!

I'm working on parametrizing a magnetic field using spherical harmonics. The equations
Yc n,m (theta, phi) = (R/R0)^n * Pn,m(cos(theta)) * cos(m*phi)
Ys n,m (theta, phi) = (R/R0)^n * Pn,m(cos(theta)) * sin(m*phi)
where Pn,m is a Legendre polynomial where n is degree and m is order of polynomial. 0<=m<=n

Bx = R0x / C1,1 * Sum{n=0:9}(Sum{m = 0:n}(Cn,m * Yc n,m))
By = R0y / S1,1 * Sum{n=0:9}(Sum{m = 0:n}(Sn,m * Ys n,m))
Bz = R0z / C1,0 * Sum{n=0:9}(Sum{m = 0:n}(Cn,m * Yc n,m))

theta, phi, and R are defined as meshes (in Matlab). Every point in 3D space has a unique R, theta, phi combination. Theta is the azimuth angle, phi is the polar angle.

Cn,m for x and z axes, as well as Sn,m for the y axis, are three separate sets of coefficients. The problem is that they are all written as rows of numbers, not pyramids (n=0,m=0; n=1,m=0 and n=1 m=1 etc.), so I am unsure which m and n value the first coefficient has. The manual indicates that the summation starts at n=0,m=0, however, it seems strange that the 3rd term in the series (C1,1) would be normalized. I am not very familiar with spherical harmonics. Could someone suggest a reasonable explanation for how normalization is done and where the summation should start?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the quick reply.
I've looked through the articles on wikipedia. One of them hints that C1,1 in the x, S1,1 in the z, and C1,0 in the z are special cases. Unfortunately, it doesn't explain why (nor do the books I looked at so far).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top