B How Does Separating the Foci Affect the Shape of a Spheroid?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the geometric implications of separating the foci of a spheroid, particularly focusing on a prolate spheroid derived from a unit sphere. It examines how the surface shape changes as the foci are moved apart, specifically questioning the lengths of the semi-major and semi-minor axes and the distance from the foci to the surface. The conversation also touches on the relationship between focal separation and the axes of the spheroid, emphasizing the need to maintain a constant volume while adjusting the dimensions. The participants consider the mathematical equations governing eccentricity and volume to derive the necessary parameters for their geometric shapes. Ultimately, the inquiry seeks to clarify how these changes affect the spheroid's geometry and surface characteristics.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,917
Reaction score
7,967
A story I wrote depends on some geometry, and I want to get it straight.

Assumptions:
1] The 2D math that applies to circles and ellipses is analagous to the 3D math for spheres and ellipsoids in the ways relevant to the rest of my post.
2] An ellipse is a circle whose two foci are co-incident. Thus, a sphere is an ellipsoid whose two foci are co-incient.

What I want to figure out is what happens to the surface of an ellipse/ellipsoid when the two co-incident foci are moved apart.

Say I have a sphere of unit radius. I move its two foci two units apart. What happens to the surface?
What is the length of its semi-minor axis?
What is the length of its semi-major axis?

And, more specifically, what happens to the distance from focus-to-surface near the "ends"?
Does the distance from focus to surface decrease as the ellipsoid "stretches" thinner? (i.e. is the focus now closer to the surface than one unit?)[ EDIT ] The correct term for my shape is a prolate spheroid - a cigar shape**. Equatorial radii a and b are the same. Polar radius c is longer.

** by magical coincidence, I am writing this while smoking a cigar.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
DaveC426913 said:
Say I have a sphere of unit radius. I move its two foci two units apart. What happens to the surface?
What is the length of its semi-minor axis?
What is the length of its semi-major axis?
Same as in the two-dimensional case. The ellipsoid you get in that way is the ellipse rotated around the symmetry axis. Note that not all ellipsoids can be produced that way - you are limited to those with one large axis and two identical smaller axes.
I wonder what shape you get if you require the sum of distances to three (instead of two) points to be constant. The two-dimensional shape can be egg-like. Another egg.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
mfb said:
Same as in the two-dimensional case. The ellipsoid you get in that way is the ellipse rotated around the symmetry axis.
Right. Which is what?

(The only reason I mentioned the 2D case is so that, when I set up some details in my story, I can sketch the simpler 2D geometry. I don't have to wory about whether 3D geometry has different behavior).
 
The end-result of my question is this: as the two foci separate, does the focus-to-surface distance (what was a moment ago, the radius) at the pole decrease to less than one unit?
 
Last edited:
DaveC426913 said:
** by magical coincidence, I am writing this while smoking a cigar.
... as long as the NFL is off season ...
DaveC426913 said:
The end-result of my question is this: as the two foci separate, does the focus-to-surface distance (what was a moment ago, the radius) at the pole decrease to less than one unit?
I have a question. Why isn't the equation for the eccentricity ##e^2 = 1 - \frac{a^2}{c^2}## from Wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spheroid) not the answer because the planar foci are ##(0,±e)##?
 
Ah. OK. Once I drew it out, it was pretty simple. Should have started with that.

elliptoid.png

So, the distance I was looking for was BP = .5
 
Shoot. So THAT's a problem. The above ellipse assumes that it is the radii that remain constant. It can not grow larger than a major axis of 2. At that point, it degenerates to a line. That's useless to me.

I'm going to need to redo it using 3D volume as a constant.

So, a sphere of one unit radius has a volume of 4/3π. I need to find the major and minor axes of a prolate elliptoid with a volume of 4/3π whose foci are one unit apart.Volume of sphere s = 4/3π*r3
Volume of prolate elliptoid e = 4/3π*a2c

e=s
4/3π*r3 = 4/3π*a2c
r=a2c
a2c = 1

Hm. Missing something here...
I need to specify a as a ratio of c.

How does the focal separation relate to the major and minor axes?
More specifically, how can I specify a and c so that the foci are one unit apart?
 
Last edited:
fresh_42 said:
I have a question. Why isn't the equation for the eccentricity ##e^2 = 1 - \frac{a^2}{c^2}## from Wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spheroid) not the answer
No idea, sorry.
 
Back
Top