Spin 1/2 System: Eigenstates of Sz and Probability of Measurement

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



For a spin 1/2 system, the eigenstates of z-component of the angular-momentum operator Sz are given by:

S_z |\pm> = \pm \frac{\hbar}{2}|\pm>

Suppose at time t, the state of the system is given by:

|\psi> = a|+> + b|->

If Sz is measured, what are the possible results of measurement and their probabilities?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Possibilities: State |+> or |->.

<+|S_z|\psi> = \frac{\hbar}{2} <+|\psi> = \frac{\hbar}{2}a

Probability of |+> state = ##\frac{\hbar ^2 a^2}{4}##

Similarly,

Probability for |-> state = ##\frac{\hbar ^2 b^2}{4}##

This is weird, as the probability should just be ##a^2## and ##b^2## correspondingly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But what's wrong with this? It is literally the "expected value of Sz".
 
Is an expected value the same thing as a probability?

How is the probability of a measurement calculated?

How is the expected value of an observable calculated?
 
George Jones said:
Is an expected value the same thing as a probability?

How is the probability of a measurement calculated?

How is the expected value of an observable calculated?

I hope I got this right.

Explanation
The eigenvalue of the operator Sz is the observable, ##\pm\frac{\hbar}{2}##.

The observable corresponding to operator Sz is angular momentum, ##\pm\frac{\hbar}{2}##.

The observables of Sz can take upon real values q1, q2, ... which are ##\pm\frac{\hbar}{2}##.

For each possible value, the system can be in a state |q1>, |q2>, ... which are for ##+\frac{\hbar}{2}## is ##|+>## and for ##-\frac{\hbar}{2}## is ##|->##

Possible states of system are |+>, |->Expected value ≠ Probability

Expected value of observable A = sandwich of operator that gives observable A = ##<\psi|\hat{A}|\psi>## ≠ Probability of measurement

Probability of a measurement = possibility of finding observable in a state ##\|q_i>## which is ## |\pm>## which means ##<q_i|\psi>^2 = <\pm|\psi>^2##.

This comes out as unitless, which looks right.
 
Last edited:
unscientific said:
An observable Q, such as Sz can take upon real values q1, q2, ...

Yes. (upon measurement of course)

For each possible value, the system can be in a state |q1>, |q2>, ...

Upon measurement returning a certain eigenvalue, the wave function collapses into the
corresponding eigenstate, yes, but before measurement it could have been in any linear
combination including this eigenstate. That's where probabilities come into play.

Possible states of system are |q1>, |q2>, ... and in this case it would be ##\frac{\hbar}{2}|\pm>##

The eigenstates are |±>, with Sz|±> = ±##\frac{\hbar}{2}|\pm>##

Expected value ≠ Probability

Yes.

Probability of a measurement = possibility of finding observable in a state |qi> which means ##<q_i|\psi>^2 = (\frac{\hbar}{2})^2<\pm|\psi>^2##

Probability of a measurement =<qi|ψ>2=##<\pm|\psi>^2##≠ ##(\frac{\hbar}{2})^2<\pm|\psi>^2##
Also, the rest is bad wording: the probability of a measurement is self explanatory, it's the
probability that a measurement returns a certain value. You don't observe a state.

Expected value of observable A = ##<\psi|A|\psi>## ≠ Probability of measurement

Yep.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top