Spin and Polarization: Understanding the Spin Operator

  • Thread starter Thread starter peterpang1994
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polarization Spin
peterpang1994
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Recently, I read an article about spin and polarization (http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s9-04/9-04.htm) , but I don't understand how the spin operator defined, can anyone give so help? any help would be great!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider if we have a complete set of vectors in 2D characterized experimentally by spin-up and spin-down in the z direction:
<br /> \mathbb{I}=|\uparrow\rangle \langle \uparrow |+|\downarrow\rangle \langle \downarrow |<br />
Then experimentally we find we can only observe two different numbers corresponding to two different physical situations, namely we measure something and it is spining up, or spining down with a number value for its angular momentum,
<br /> S_{z}=\frac{\hbar}{2}|\uparrow\rangle \langle \uparrow |-\frac{\hbar}{2}|\downarrow\rangle \langle \downarrow |<br />
Now let's consider the different possibilities for measuring these values along the z-axis, this is given by
<br /> \sum_{n,m=1}^{2}\langle n|S_{z}|m\rangle<br />
where by we examine the different situations
<br /> \langle \uparrow |S_{z}|\uparrow\rangle<br />
<br /> \langle \uparrow |S_{z}|\downarrow \rangle<br />
<br /> \langle \downarrow |S_{z}|\uparrow \rangle<br />
<br /> \langle \downarrow |S_{z}|\downarrow \rangle<br />
These can be combined into a single object and the inner products can be evaluated explicitly to give
<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> \langle \uparrow |S_{z}|\uparrow\rangle &amp; \langle \uparrow |S_{z}|\downarrow \rangle \\<br /> \langle \downarrow |S_{z}|\uparrow \rangle &amp; \langle \downarrow |S_{z}|\downarrow \rangle<br /> \end{pmatrix}=\frac{\hbar}{2}<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -1<br /> \end{pmatrix}=\frac{\hbar}{2}\sigma_{z}<br />
This is one component of the spin matrices. a similar method yields the other two.
 
thank you very much. Is that the operator you suggested in only focused on the electron in a hydrogen atom? And I am still having problems on the total orbital angular momentum and the total spin.
 
It's for the z-component of the total spin. Once one has constructed all three components they can calculate S^2=\mathbf{S}\cdot \mathbf{S} which is the total spin operator (squared). This operator commutes with all three components of the spin.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top