Spin Coupling, Matrix Building

sol66
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
So I understand that the tensor product of two vector spaces constitutes a new vector space. In the case of spin coupling you have some arbitrary vector |x,z> where x represents the spin state of particle 1 and z represents the spin state of particle 2; bot spin states being general 2 element vectors.

This is where I question my understanding, from what I can see ... the tensor product of individual eigenspaces containing vector x and z creates a new eigenspace that holds the general vector |x,z>. Also it seems that you can construct a matrix out of your eigenstates using the basis from your eigenspaces holding the spinstates x and z. So is my understanding correct?

If I am right, my other question is ... how do you construct such a matrix?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to list out all possible two-particle states, such as
$$
\begin{pmatrix}
| x, z \rangle \\
| x, -z \rangle \\
| -x, z \rangle \\
| -x, -z \rangle
\end{pmatrix}
$$
to use the notation in the OP, or more commonly
$$
\begin{pmatrix}
| z, z \rangle \\
| z, -z \rangle \\
| -z, z \rangle \\
| -z, -z \rangle
\end{pmatrix}
$$
As always, the matrix representation is not unique, as the choice of basis is not unique, nor is the order of the elements in a given basis.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top