Understanding Spin Foam Cosmological Model: Explained in Basic Terms

  • Thread starter Thread starter Feeble Wonk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spin
Feeble Wonk
Messages
241
Reaction score
44
The intricacies of the theory are hopelessly over my head. But I'm trying to clarify my understanding of the Spin Foam cosmological model in very basic and generalized terms.
The logical starting point might be in understanding what the SPIN in spin foam refers to. My cursory scan of web articles seemed to skip right over that bit of basic information. I'd appreciate any help that anyone might offer on this subject.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Feeble Wonk said:
The intricacies of the theory are hopelessly over my head
Mine, too.
Feeble Wonk said:
I'm trying to clarify my understanding of the Spin Foam cosmological model in very basic and generalized terms.
Not likely to get many talking about something few know much about, and everything I've found is variations of concepts that have basically nothing to compare to descriptively. The only thing I can say with some confidence is that the spin is just quantum spin, foam relates to the vacuum energy or the "background" and spin networks associate connections in a system. How it all adds up "cosmologically" is way out of my scope for now.
 
jerromyjon said:
Not likely to get many talking about something few know much about, and everything I've found is variations of concepts that have basically nothing to compare to descriptively. The only thing I can say with some confidence is that the spin is just quantum spin, foam relates to the vacuum energy or the "background" and spin networks associate connections in a system. How it all adds up "cosmologically" is way out of my scope for now.

Thank you very much. So, the spin DOES refer to quantum spin and the foam IS the vacuum quantum foam of virtual particles. I just wanted to make sure I had at least that much right.

I'd read a bit by Lee Smolin that suggested the spin foam model was a leading cosmology theory which views space and matter/energy as emergent properties, but stipulates that time is a (the) fundamental parameter. I'm struggling to wrap my head around that.
 
Feeble Wonk said:
I'm struggling to wrap my head around that.
Just start at t=0. Go forward until you reach t=-1. Then you have your head around it.
 
LMAO.
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Back
Top