Sping Matrices and Commutation Relations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on verifying the commutation relations of spin matrices, specifically the matrices for spin operators Sx, Sy, and Sz as defined in Equations 4.145 and 4.147. The commutation relations are confirmed as [Sx, Sy] = iħSz, [Sy, Sz] = iħSx, and [Sz, Sx] = iħSy. The matrices are expressed in terms of ħ, and the calculations demonstrate the validity of these relations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with angular momentum operators
  • Knowledge of matrix algebra
  • Proficiency in using LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular momentum commutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the properties of spin matrices and their applications in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the significance of the Planck constant (ħ) in quantum physics
  • Investigate the role of spin in quantum state representation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, as well as educators teaching angular momentum concepts.

Rahmuss
Messages
222
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Check that the spin matrices (Equations 4.145 and 4.147) obey the fundamental commutation relations for angular momentum, Equation 4.134.

Homework Equations


Eq. 4.147a --> S_{x} = \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}

Eq. 4.147b --> S_{y} = \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{pmatrix}

Eq. 4.145 --> S_{z} = \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}

\left[ S_{x}, S_{y}\right] = i\hbar S_{z}

\left[ S_{y}, S_{z}\right] = i\hbar S_{x}

\left[ S_{z}, S_{x}\right] = i\hbar S_{y}

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, from Eq. 4.147 I have S_{x} = \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} and also S_{y} = \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{pmatrix}

So \left[ S_{x}, S_{y} \right] = i\hbar S_{z} \Rightarrow

\left[ \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{pmatrix}0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{pmatrix} \right] \Rightarrow

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{4}\begin{pmatrix}0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{pmatrix} - \frac{\hbar^{2}}{4}\begin{pmatrix}0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \Rightarrow

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{4}\begin{pmatrix}i & 0 \\ 0 & -i \end{pmatrix} - \frac{\hbar^{2}}{4}\begin{pmatrix}-i & 0 \\ 0 & i \end{pmatrix} = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{4}\begin{pmatrix}2i & 0 \\ 0 & -2i \end{pmatrix}

It doesn't quite seem right to me because the answer shows:

\left[ S_{x}, S_{y}\right] = i\hbar S_{z}

But I can't see how I'd get that from where I'm going.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer IS i*hbar*S_z.
 
Err... hey, you're right. :D

This idiot thanks you.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K