A straightforward attempt to generalize the Schrodinger equation to a relativistic equation, is obtained by taking the Eigenvector/value equation:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[itex]H |a_k> = E_k |a_k>[/itex]

with a hamiltonian of the form [itex]H= T+V [/itex],

In the relativistic case we have [itex]T=\sqrt{p^2+m^2}[/itex] , and taking also (for my purposes) the case that [itex]V(\vec{x})=0[/itex] we get the Spinless Salpeter equation:

[itex] \sqrt{p^2 +m^2} |a_k> = E_k |a_k> [/itex]

(http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9807342 , below eq.1)

I was wondering, how can someone see immediately that this form of the Hamiltonian is non-local? I think that someone sees this by looking at the propagator? Or does someone get this by writting the Lagrangian and seeing it's non-local (contains terms that are not functions of the fields or their derivatives)?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Spinless Salpeter equation non-locality

Loading...

Similar Threads - Spinless Salpeter equation | Date |
---|---|

A Positive and negative plane wave solutions of Dirac equation | Feb 27, 2018 |

A Transformation of solutions of the Dirac equation | Feb 20, 2018 |

A Decay of polarized particle into two spinless | Apr 16, 2016 |

Cross section for elastic scattering of unpolarized electrons from spinless particles | May 13, 2012 |

Spinless Electron-Muon Scattering (Halzen-Martin) | Mar 12, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**