Spinless Salpeter equation non-locality

  • Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date
  • #1
ChrisVer
Gold Member
3,373
459
A straightforward attempt to generalize the Schrodinger equation to a relativistic equation, is obtained by taking the Eigenvector/value equation:
[itex]H |a_k> = E_k |a_k>[/itex]

with a hamiltonian of the form [itex]H= T+V [/itex],

In the relativistic case we have [itex]T=\sqrt{p^2+m^2}[/itex] , and taking also (for my purposes) the case that [itex]V(\vec{x})=0[/itex] we get the Spinless Salpeter equation:

[itex] \sqrt{p^2 +m^2} |a_k> = E_k |a_k> [/itex]

(http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9807342 , below eq.1)

I was wondering, how can someone see immediately that this form of the Hamiltonian is non-local? I think that someone sees this by looking at the propagator? Or does someone get this by writting the Lagrangian and seeing it's non-local (contains terms that are not functions of the fields or their derivatives)?
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
2,792
594
The point is that you can taylor expand the kinetic energy operator w.r.t. p and it will be an infinite series. But the momentum operator in that series is a derivative operator and that means that operator(T) is in fact differentiating to infinite order. But the higher the derivative, the more points you need and those points get farther from the point your considering which, for an infinite order differentiation, means the points very very far from a point affect the properties of that point and so the theory is non-local.
 

Related Threads on Spinless Salpeter equation non-locality

  • Last Post
2
Replies
28
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
886
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
6K
Top