Sports question. Team Race to 6 points chances

themaestro
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Was hoping someone might be able to assist in this problem
Scenario is have a American football game with two team A and team B.

Am trying to work out the probability of each team getting to 6 points first, from the following infomation:

Let A be the event team A scores equal to or more than 6 points
Let B be the event team B scores equal to or more than 6 points
Assuming P(A) and P(B) are independant so P(A and B)=P(A)P(B)

Also making the assumption that Team A has possession and have a 0.62 chance of scoring a touchdown (worth 6 points) on this possession
Let this be labelled as P(Apo)

let Af be the event team A gets to 6 points first
let Bf be the event team B gets to 6 points first

Let P(A)=0.7, P(B)=0.7
P(Af given (A and B))=0.75
P(Bf given (A and B))=0.25

so question is what are P(Af) and P(Bf)?
when I try to calculate I get P(Af)=0.5775 which clearly can't be right as need
P(Af)>=P(Apo).
Is there any problems with the assumptions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
here is details of my attempt.


P(Af)=P(Af| (A and B)) *P(A and B) + P(Af| not(A and B))*P(not(A and B)) (1)

since P(Af| not(A and B)) can only occur if Team A reaches 6 points and B does not then this is equal to

(P(A)- P(A and B)) / (P(not(A and B))


sub into (1) and simplfying gives

P(Af)=P(Af| (A and B)) *P(A and B) +P(A)- P(A and B)


sub in values for these and I get P(Af)=0.557.


can't see where I have made a mistake here. If it is correct then it would imply I am not free to set P(Apo)>0.557 but I am not sure why this would be true. Surley as long as P(Apo)<P(A) i am free to set whatever value I want for this?
 
Just wondering if anyone has any ideas about where I have gone wrong? i reckon there must be some other relationship between P(Af) and P(Apo) that I have not taken account of.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top