Spreading of a pulse as it propagates in a dispersive medium

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aguss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Medium Pulse
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the propagation of a pulse in a dispersive medium, specifically addressing the mathematical formulation of the problem. The user begins with the expression for a one-dimensional pulse and derives the function A(k) based on initial conditions, considering the case where the time derivative of the pulse is zero. They introduce a Gaussian-modulated oscillation as the initial pulse shape and seek clarification on how to derive the expression for A(k) from this initial condition. The solution involves rewriting the cosine term in exponential form, completing the square, and applying Gaussian integral techniques, which ultimately leads to resolving the integral successfully. The user expresses gratitude for the assistance and confirms they were able to solve the problem.
Aguss
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!
I am studying the spreading of a pulse as it propagates in a dispersive medium, from a well known book. My problem arise when i have to solve an expression.

Firstly i begin considering that a 1-dim pulse can be written as:


u(x,t) = 1/2*1/√2∏* ∫A(k)*exp(ikx-iw(k)t) dk + cc (complex conjugate)


and then i showed that A(k) can be express in terms of the initial values of the problem, taking into account that w(k)=w(-k) (isotropic medium):

A(k) = 1/√2∏ ∫ exp(-ikx) * (u(x,0) + i/w(k) * du/dt (x,0)) dx

I considered du/dt(x,0)=0 which means that the problems involves 2 pulses with the same amplitud and velocity but oposite directions.
So A(k) takes the form:

A(k) = 1/√2∏ ∫ exp(-ikx) * u(x,0)

Now i take a Gaussian modulated oscilattion as the initial shape of the pulse:

u(x,0) = exp(-x^2/2L^2) cos(ko x)


Then the book says that we can easily reach to the expression:

A(k) = 1/√2∏ ∫ exp(-ikx) exp(-x^2/2L^2) cos (ko x) dx



= L/2 (exp(-(L^2/2) (k-ko)^2) + exp(-(L^2/2) (k+ko)^2)

How did he reach to this?? How can i solve this last integral?


Then, with the expression of A(k) into u(x,t) arise other problem. How can i solve this other integral.


Thank you very much for helping me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
that is a trick.you have to write cos(k0x) as Re(eik0x),you will get only exponentials then you will have to complete the square in powers of exponentials and use of a simple gaussian integral.
0 e(-x2)dx=√∏/2
 
Thank you so much! I could solve it! It wasnt too hard after all :) thanks again.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top