Spring force and the force of friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a misunderstanding of mass representation in a physics assignment related to spring force and friction. The user is confused about why the mass (m) is canceled out in the equations, believing it represents different masses for two boxes. The clarification provided indicates that the same mass (m) applies to both boxes, allowing them to accelerate together due to sufficient friction. This understanding is crucial for solving the assignment correctly. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing the context of mass in physics problems.
curicuri
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A box with a mass of 20 kg is put on a vertical table that is is free from friction. On top of that box is another box with the mass of 2 kg. The friction number between the boxes are 0,35. The big box that lays on the table has a spring attached to it, that has the "spring-constant"=400N/m. The spring is attached to the wall on the other end.
Determine max amplitude that can be obtained without the small box falling off.
Relevant Equations
Ff=Fr
Hello, do someone have time to help me out with an assignment?

My question
In the answer sheet they say:
244937

What I do not understand is why m is withdrawn from both sides, since I don't see that those represent the same mass. When I did the assignment I thought m at the left side would be the mass of the small box, and m at the right side would be the mass of the big box. That was why I did not cancel m out, which was why I got the wrong answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to know that the friction between the boxes is large enough to accelerate the small box with the same acceleration. So ##m## is the small box on both sides.
 
AA of course, thank you :)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top