Spring mass pulley system frequency equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the natural frequency equation for a spring mass pulley system, specifically the formula f = (1/2π) * SQRT(k / (m + m(s)/3)), where f represents frequency, k is the spring constant, m is the mass attached to the spring, and m(s) is the mass of the spring. Participants emphasized the importance of starting with a massless spring and pulley to simplify the problem before considering additional complexities. The conversation also highlighted the need for free body diagrams and static equilibrium analysis to understand the forces involved in the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic motion and natural frequency
  • Familiarity with spring constants and mass properties
  • Knowledge of free body diagrams and force balance equations
  • Basic principles of static equilibrium in mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of natural frequency for mass-spring systems without additional masses
  • Learn about free body diagram techniques for dynamic systems
  • Explore the impact of mass distribution in oscillating systems
  • Investigate experimental methods for measuring natural frequency in spring-mass systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying mechanics, physics educators, and engineers involved in designing oscillating systems or analyzing dynamic behavior in mechanical structures.

Name15
Messages
30
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A spring is attached to the ceiling, a pulley is attached to the other end of the spring, a string is suspended over the pulley, and a mass attached to the free end of this string. The system oscillates vertically.

Can someone PLEASE help me derive this equation for natural frequency:

f = (1/2pi) * SQRT(k / (m + m(s)/3))

where f = frequency
k= spring constant
m = mass attached to a spring
m(s) = mass of spring

Homework Equations


F=ma=-kx
mx''+kx=0
(Wn)^2 =k/m

The Attempt at a Solution


mx''=-kx
x''=-wn^2.x
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you provide a diagram. Your description doesn't make sense if the string is not somehow anchored on the other end.

Chet
 
SHM_Dia_30.gif


sorry, i should have mentioned, the string is attached to say a table.
 
Are you supposed to be considering the case where the spring has mass, or are you allowed to assume that the spring is massless? Is the pulley supposed to have mass?

I suggest that you solve this problem first for the case of a massless spring and pulley. Why? Because if you can't solve it for that case, then you'll never be able to do it for more complicated cases. Plus, when you complete that solution, you will have something to show for it, and will have developed the general technique for attacking the problem.

Have you considered drawing free body diagrams on the spring and mass, and identifying the forces acting on each? Have you written down force balance equations for the spring and mass?

Chet
 
i have tried many different approaches, from equation of motion to energy conservation methods, only to have been unsuccessful.

The spring and pulley masses are considered in the above. The string is massless.
 
Name15 said:
i have tried many different approaches, from equation of motion to energy conservation methods, only to have been unsuccessful.

The spring and pulley masses are considered in the above. The string is massless.
Well, you have to go back to basics. Can you at least determine the tensions in the string and spring if the system is in static equilibrium, without any oscillation? That would be your starting point for the dynamic analysis.

Chet
 
for system without mass: 2T=kx
when mass is isolated: T=mg
 
<< Mentor Note -- 2 threads merged >>[/color]

In an experiment to determine the natural frequency of a spring-mass-pulley system, why would the experimental natural frequency (found using 1/time) be greater than the theoretical natural frequency found using the following:

f=1/2pi∗sqrt(k/4m+ms/3)Anything other than the pulley mass and rope mass being neglected.

Also, should the experimental f be greater?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K