Spring mass pulley system frequency equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the equation for the natural frequency of a spring-mass-pulley system, where a spring is attached to a ceiling and a mass is suspended via a pulley. The participants explore the dynamics of the system, including the effects of the spring's mass and the assumptions regarding massless components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various approaches, including equations of motion and energy conservation methods. Questions arise about the assumptions regarding the mass of the spring and pulley, as well as the need for free body diagrams to analyze forces in static equilibrium.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the assumptions made about the system's components. Some guidance has been offered regarding starting with a massless spring and pulley to simplify the problem. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between experimental and theoretical frequencies, with no clear consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the string is considered massless, and there is a focus on whether the spring and pulley masses should be included in the analysis. The discussion also touches on the conditions under which the experimental frequency may differ from theoretical predictions.

Name15
Messages
30
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A spring is attached to the ceiling, a pulley is attached to the other end of the spring, a string is suspended over the pulley, and a mass attached to the free end of this string. The system oscillates vertically.

Can someone PLEASE help me derive this equation for natural frequency:

f = (1/2pi) * SQRT(k / (m + m(s)/3))

where f = frequency
k= spring constant
m = mass attached to a spring
m(s) = mass of spring

Homework Equations


F=ma=-kx
mx''+kx=0
(Wn)^2 =k/m

The Attempt at a Solution


mx''=-kx
x''=-wn^2.x
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you provide a diagram. Your description doesn't make sense if the string is not somehow anchored on the other end.

Chet
 
SHM_Dia_30.gif


sorry, i should have mentioned, the string is attached to say a table.
 
Are you supposed to be considering the case where the spring has mass, or are you allowed to assume that the spring is massless? Is the pulley supposed to have mass?

I suggest that you solve this problem first for the case of a massless spring and pulley. Why? Because if you can't solve it for that case, then you'll never be able to do it for more complicated cases. Plus, when you complete that solution, you will have something to show for it, and will have developed the general technique for attacking the problem.

Have you considered drawing free body diagrams on the spring and mass, and identifying the forces acting on each? Have you written down force balance equations for the spring and mass?

Chet
 
i have tried many different approaches, from equation of motion to energy conservation methods, only to have been unsuccessful.

The spring and pulley masses are considered in the above. The string is massless.
 
Name15 said:
i have tried many different approaches, from equation of motion to energy conservation methods, only to have been unsuccessful.

The spring and pulley masses are considered in the above. The string is massless.
Well, you have to go back to basics. Can you at least determine the tensions in the string and spring if the system is in static equilibrium, without any oscillation? That would be your starting point for the dynamic analysis.

Chet
 
for system without mass: 2T=kx
when mass is isolated: T=mg
 
<< Mentor Note -- 2 threads merged >>[/color]

In an experiment to determine the natural frequency of a spring-mass-pulley system, why would the experimental natural frequency (found using 1/time) be greater than the theoretical natural frequency found using the following:

f=1/2pi∗sqrt(k/4m+ms/3)Anything other than the pulley mass and rope mass being neglected.

Also, should the experimental f be greater?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K