Sqaure Wave Fourier Transform question

nissanztt90
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is a question from a Physics Lab i recently completed. We used a function generator to provide a signal to a spectrum analyzer that performed a Fourier transform on the signal. In this case the signal was a square wave. When viewing the Fourier transform on a log scale, smaller peaks were being produced of a constant magnitude compared to the main Fourier peaks that incrementally dropped in magnitude. What do these smaller peaks correspond to?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The only thing i can come up with is that the signal was not totally pure? I really don't understand Fourier transforms all that well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nissanztt90 said:

Homework Statement



This is a question from a Physics Lab i recently completed. We used a function generator to provide a signal to a spectrum analyzer that performed a Fourier transform on the signal. In this case the signal was a square wave. When viewing the Fourier transform on a log scale, smaller peaks were being produced of a constant magnitude compared to the main Fourier peaks that incrementally dropped in magnitude. What do these smaller peaks correspond to?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The only thing i can come up with is that the signal was not totally pure? I really don't understand Fourier transforms all that well.

Can you post shots of the square wave and the spectrum analyzer screen?

(BTW, I may move this to Intro Physics; I'm not sure yet.)
 
Cant post a picture unfortunately.

I apologize if its in the wrong forum again, i didnt think Fourier transforms were introductory physics. I ran a search on Fourier and saw mostly advanced physics and calculus and beyond, so i thought this forum was acceptable.

The base frequency was 100mhz, so the standard scale showed increasingly smaller peaks every 100mhz. The log scale showed more or less the same thing with the magnitude of the peaks decreasing but a different scale obviously, as well as peaks that remained at a constant magnitude, maybe 2/3 the magnitude of the largest main peak.
 
nissanztt90 said:
Cant post a picture unfortunately.

I apologize if its in the wrong forum again, i didnt think Fourier transforms were introductory physics. I ran a search on Fourier and saw mostly advanced physics and calculus and beyond, so i thought this forum was acceptable.

The base frequency was 100mhz, so the standard scale showed increasingly smaller peaks every 100mhz. The log scale showed more or less the same thing with the magnitude of the peaks decreasing but a different scale obviously, as well as peaks that remained at a constant magnitude, maybe 2/3 the magnitude of the largest main peak.

No worries about the forum. Could you maybe sketch the spectrum analyzer display and scan/post it? It's hard to speculate on the source of the other spectrum spikes without seeing their spacing, frequencies, etc.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top