Square of wave function gives us the probability density

ahsaas
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

we often say that the square of wave function gives us the probability density where the particle is. how can the square of a function might predict about the existence of a particle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not?
 
ahsaas said:

how can the square of a function might predict about the existence of a particle?


It's a fundamental postulate of quantum mechanics, in the wave-mechanics formulation. and therefore has no further explanation. Its justification is the experimental verification of predictions derived from it and the other postulates of QM.
 
jtbell said:
It's a fundamental postulate of quantum mechanics, in the wave-mechanics formulation. and therefore has no further explanation. Its justification is the experimental verification of predictions derived from it and the other postulates of QM.
Is the uncertainty in the wave-function caused by our inability to measure the particles without affecting them?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top