Square Root of 4: Can it be +2 or -2?

AI Thread Summary
The square root of 4 is conventionally defined as +2, despite -2 also being a valid solution since (-2)² equals 4. This convention ensures that the square root function is single-valued, leading to the definition that √a represents the positive root. Regarding the imaginary number i, squaring equations can introduce extraneous solutions, as shown in the example where squaring i² = -1 leads to an incorrect conclusion. The distinction between the principal square root and the general solutions is crucial for clarity in mathematical discussions. Understanding these conventions helps clarify common misconceptions in mathematics.
Taturana
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Consider square root of 4.

Can square root of 4 be +2 or -2?

I asked that to my math teacher so he said: NO, square root of 4 is +2!

But I can't really understand why it cannot be -2 since -2 squared is also 4. One thing I've imagined is: square root of 4 can be +2 or -2, but for CONVENTION we use +2. Is that right?

There's another question related to that: consider

i^2 = -1

squaring the two sides we obtain

i^4 = 1

so

i = 1

so: can the i (the imaginary number) be 1? I think I'm making a lot of confusion with that, could someone explain me that?

Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The square root of 4 can be +2 or -2, your math teacher is retarded. What you did with the imaginary number results in what I believe is called an extraneous solution (correct me if I'm wrong). If you substitute the 1 back into your original problem i^2=-1, you will find that 1=-1, which is not a true statement, meaning the solution is incorrect.
 
We get these types of questions a lot so it might be worthwhile to run a forum search on this topic to get a very thorough review of it. In fact, I might even say that this question has been discussed ad nauseum :wink:

However, for your first question the, square root of a number is often defined as the principal (or positive) root. This convention is not without reason though; if we would like to have a square root function, the square roots must necessarily be single-valued. Therefore, \sqrt{4} = 2. For a more complicated example, let x be a number such that x^2 = 4, then \sqrt{x^2} = |x| = 2 because \sqrt{x^2} is necessarily positive. Since |x| = 2, this means that x = 2 or x = -2.

For your second question, squaring equations has the unfortunate effect of adding extraneous solutions. Taking your example, clearly i^4 - 1 = 0 in which case (i^2 + 1)(i^2 - 1) = 0. By the zero product property, either i^2 + 1 = 0 or i^2 - 1 = 0 (note that only one of these need hold). From the conventional definition of i we have that i^2 + 1 = 0 and i^2 - 1 = 0 is just an extraneous solution added when we squared the equation.

Hopefully this all makes sense.
 
Thank you for the help guys. Now things make more sense.

PS: next time i'll do a forum search...
 
eg2333 said:
The square root of 4 can be +2 or -2, your math teacher is retarded. What you did with the imaginary number results in what I believe is called an extraneous solution (correct me if I'm wrong). If you substitute the 1 back into your original problem i^2=-1, you will find that 1=-1, which is not a true statement, meaning the solution is incorrect.

If his teacher is retarded, what does that make you? His teacher is completely right. The equation x^2= 4 has two roots. But only one of them is \sqrt{4} because \sqrt{a} is defined as "the positive root of the equation x^2= a".

The reason we have to write the solutions to that equation as "x= \pm\sqrt{a} is that \sqrt{a} alone does NOT mean both solutions. If it did we would not need the "\pm".
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top