Square root of a square plus 1

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that the square root of a natural number squared plus one, specifically sqrt(n^2 + 1), is not a natural number for any natural number n greater than 0.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various approaches to demonstrate that sqrt(n^2 + 1) cannot be a natural number, including algebraic manipulations and contradictions. Questions arise regarding the implications of assuming sqrt(n^2 + 1) equals a natural number and the resulting equations.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered different lines of reasoning, with some suggesting algebraic identities and others checking assumptions about the nature of integers. There is a general exploration of contradictions arising from the assumptions made, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

The discussion is constrained by the requirement that n must be a natural number greater than 0, which influences the reasoning and conclusions drawn by participants.

icantadd
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


prove that if n is a natural number greater than 0, then sqrt(n^2 + 1) is not a natural number.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I can't tell if I am right, which probably means that I am not.

Assume sqrt(n^2+1) is a natural number. Then there is a natural number j such that j = sqrt(n^2+1). Thus
j^2 = n^2 + 1. Then, I am stuck.
It seems too easy to prove, is there some little trick I am missing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is (j+1)2?
 
If [itex]\sqrt{n^2+1}= m[/itex] then [itex]n^2+ 1= m^2[/itex]. Now, what can you say about [itex]n^2- m^2[/itex]?
 
HallsofIvy said:
If [itex]\sqrt{n^2+1}= m[/itex] then [itex]n^2+ 1= m^2[/itex]. Now, what can you say about [itex]n^2- m^2[/itex]?

[itex]n^2 - m^2 = -1[/itex] Which gives me a contradiction because this can only happen when n=0 and m =1, and the problem assumes n is strictly > 0.

Did I get it?

If so, then thank you!
 
Well, yeah, i think that should be right.

However, i would be inclined to proceede this way:

[tex]m^2-n^2=1=>(m-n)(m+n)=1[/tex] Then since both m, n are supposed to be integers(natural nrs) then the only possible way for this to be true is if:

[tex]m-n=m+n=1[/tex]

or

[tex]m-n=m+n=-1[/tex]

Because, we know that the only numbers that have inverses in Z are 1 and -1.

From the firs eq we get:m=1, n=0, which is a contradiction since the hypothesis says, n>0

From the second: m=-1 and n=0.

Which is again not possible.
 
Possibly another way of going about it:

We begin with some number n∈N, we may then claim n^2∈N. We now want to prove that √(n^2+1) ∉N. We do this by defining the next natural number m by m=(n+1); hence, m^2=(n+1)^2= n^2+2n+1. Therefore n^2<n^2+1<m^2 ∀n>0, proving that √(n^2+1) ∉N. Q.E.D.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K