Squaring out coordinates (with trig)

  • Thread starter Thread starter UniPhysics90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinates Trig
UniPhysics90
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm following a worked example and really don't get a certain step in it: the step is going between

r=(-(s-2a)sin($) , scos($))

and

(r^2)=(s^2)+(4(a^2)-4as)sin($)

First of all how do you 'square' coordinates? I would have though it stays as coordinates?

Even when i try different ways of multiplying it out i can't get this answer, i always end up with extra terms or wrong coefficients.

any help would be great.

thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Note that r is actually a vector, with two components (r = (r1, r2).
So when they write r², they actually mean
r² = r . r = r1² + r2².

You will have to use that sin² + cos² = 1. Just watch out when you calculate (a + b)², it is not а² + b².
 
r2= r.r is not very good notation (although some books use it).
What they mean, and should use, is |r|2.
 
Yes, welcome in the world of lazy physicists ;)
Why write two bars if you can have a convention to leave them out :P
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top